Straight Chad R, Brady Anne O, Evans Ellen M
1University of Georgia, Athens, GA 2University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC.
Menopause. 2016 Apr;23(4):410-6. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000543.
The aim of this study was to examine the association between asymmetry in leg extension power (LP) and lower-extremity physical function (LEF) in community-dwelling older women.
Older women (n = 94, 74.0 ± 5.5 y) were assessed for unilateral LP (watts) using the Nottingham power rig, and absolute and relative (%ASYM) differences in LP between the dominant and nondominant legs were calculated. LEF was assessed via the 6-minute walk, 8-foot up-and-go and 30-second chair stand, and a composite measure of LEF was calculated by summing z scores of each test. In addition, body composition was measured via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and moderate-intensity physical activity was assessed via questionnaire.
The absolute difference in LP between the dominant and nondominant legs was 10.2 ± 9.0 watts, which translated to a %ASYM of 11.3% ± 10.5% (P < 0.01). %ASYM had bivariate associations with all individual measures of LEF (r range = -0.22 to -0.34, all P < 0.05). Using multivariate linear regression, %ASYM was an independent predictor of a composite LEF z score (standardized β= -0.18, P < 0.05) after adjustment for age, comorbidities, physical activity, relative adiposity, and total leg power. Analysis of covariance indicated that women with low asymmetry had a significantly better LEF z score than those with high asymmetry (0.60 vs -0.13, P = 0.04).
These findings indicate that a greater magnitude of asymmetry in LP is associated with poorer LEF in older women. Research is needed to determine whether interventions that correct asymmetries in lower-body muscle power confer functional benefits in older women.
本研究旨在探讨社区居住老年女性腿部伸展力量(LP)不对称与下肢身体功能(LEF)之间的关联。
使用诺丁汉力量测试装置评估老年女性(n = 94,74.0 ± 5.5岁)的单侧LP(瓦特),计算优势腿和非优势腿之间LP的绝对差异和相对差异(%ASYM)。通过6分钟步行、8英尺起坐和30秒椅子站立测试评估LEF,并通过对每个测试的z分数求和计算LEF的综合测量值。此外,通过双能X线吸收法测量身体成分,并通过问卷调查评估中等强度身体活动。
优势腿和非优势腿之间LP的绝对差异为10.2 ± 9.0瓦特,转化为%ASYM为11.3% ± 10.5%(P < 0.01)。%ASYM与所有LEF个体测量值均存在双变量关联(r范围 = -0.22至-0.34,所有P < 0.05)。使用多元线性回归,在调整年龄、合并症、身体活动、相对肥胖和总腿部力量后,%ASYM是LEF综合z分数的独立预测因素(标准化β = -0.18,P < 0.05)。协方差分析表明,不对称程度低的女性的LEF z分数显著高于不对称程度高的女性(0.60对-0.13,P = 0.04)。
这些发现表明,LP不对称程度越大,老年女性的LEF越差。需要进行研究以确定纠正下身肌肉力量不对称的干预措施是否能给老年女性带来功能益处。