Smith-Spark James H, Zięcik Adam P, Sterling Christopher
Department of Psychology, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, UK.
Department of Psychology, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, UK.
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Feb-Mar;49-50:34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
Prospective memory (PM) is memory for delayed intentions. Despite its importance to everyday life, the few studies on PM function in adults with dyslexia which exist have relied on self-report measures. To determine whether self-reported PM deficits can be measured objectively, laboratory-based PM tasks were administered to 24 adults with dyslexia and 25 age- and IQ-matched adults without dyslexia. Self-report data indicated that people with dyslexia felt that time-based PM (TBPM; requiring responses at certain times in the future) was most problematic for them and so this form of PM was the focus of investigation. Whilst performing the ongoing task from which they were required to break out every 3 min to make a PM-related response, the participants were allowed to make clock checks whenever they wished. The cognitive demands made on ongoing behaviour were manipulated to determine whether loading executive resources had a mediating role in dyslexia-related deficits in PM, resulting in three tasks with varying working memory load. A semi-naturalistic TBPM task was also administered, in which the participants were asked to remind the experimenter to save a data file 40 min after being given this instruction. Dyslexia-related differences were found across all three computerized tasks, regardless of cognitive load. The adults with dyslexia made fewer correct PM responses and also fewer clock checks. On the semi-naturalistic task, the participants with dyslexia were less likely to remember to remind the experimenter to save the file. This is the first study to document PM deficits in dyslexia using objective measures of performance. Since TBPM impairments were found under more naturalistic conditions as well as on computerized tasks, the results have implications for workplace support for adults with dyslexia.
前瞻记忆(PM)是对延迟意图的记忆。尽管它对日常生活很重要,但现有的关于阅读障碍成年人PM功能的少数研究依赖于自我报告测量。为了确定自我报告的PM缺陷是否可以客观测量,对24名阅读障碍成年人和25名年龄及智商匹配的非阅读障碍成年人进行了基于实验室的PM任务。自我报告数据表明,阅读障碍患者认为基于时间的PM(TBPM;需要在未来特定时间做出反应)对他们来说问题最大,因此这种PM形式是研究的重点。在执行持续任务时,要求他们每3分钟中断一次以做出与PM相关的反应,参与者可以随时查看时钟。对持续行为的认知需求进行了操纵,以确定加载执行资源是否在阅读障碍相关的PM缺陷中起中介作用,从而产生了三个工作记忆负荷不同的任务。还进行了一项半自然主义的TBPM任务,要求参与者在收到此指令40分钟后提醒实验者保存数据文件。无论认知负荷如何,在所有三项计算机化任务中都发现了与阅读障碍相关的差异。阅读障碍成年人做出的正确PM反应较少,查看时钟的次数也较少。在半自然主义任务中,阅读障碍参与者不太可能记得提醒实验者保存文件。这是第一项使用客观绩效测量来记录阅读障碍中PM缺陷的研究。由于在更自然的条件下以及计算机化任务中都发现了TBPM损伤,这些结果对阅读障碍成年人的工作场所支持具有启示意义。