Nakayama A, Major G, Holliday E, Attia J, Bogduk N
Department of Rheumatology, Bone and Joint Centre Royal Newcastle Centre/John Hunter Hospital, Lookout Road, New Lambton Heights, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2305, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Mar;27(3):873-879. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3443-0. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
We assessed the ability of a fracture liaison service (FLS) to directly reduce re-fracture risk. Having a FLS is associated with a ∼40% reduction in the 3-year risk of major bone and ∼30% of any bone re-fracture. The number needed to treat to prevent a re-fracture is 20.
FLS have been promoted as the most effective interventions for secondary fracture prevention, and while there is evidence of increased rate of investigation and treatment at institutions with a FLS, only a few studies have considered fracture outcomes directly. We therefore sought to evaluate the ability of our FLS to reduce re-fracture risk.
Historical cohort study of all patients ≥50 years presenting over a 6-month period with a minimal trauma fracture (MTF) to the emergency departments of a tertiary hospital with a FLS, and one without a FLS. Baseline characteristics, mortality and MTFs over a 3-year follow-up were recorded.
Five hundred fifteen patients at the FLS hospital and 416 patients at the non-FLS hospital were studied. Over 3 years, 63/515 (12%) patients at the FLS hospital and 70/416 (17%) at the non-FLS hospital had a MTF. All patients were analysed in an intention-to-treat analysis regardless of whether they were seen in the FLS follow-up clinic. Statistical analysis using Cox proportional hazard models in the presence of a competing risk of death from any cause was used. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, there was a ∼30% reduction in rate of any re-fracture at the FLS hospital (hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.95, p value 0.025) and a ∼40% reduction in major re-fractures (hip, spine, femur, pelvis or humerus) (HR 0.59, CI 0.39-0.90, p value 0.013).
We found a ∼30% reduction in any re-fractures and a ∼40% reduction in major re-fractures at the FLS hospital compared with a similar non-FLS hospital. The number of patients needed to treat to prevent one new fracture over 3 years is 20.
我们评估了骨折联络服务(FLS)直接降低再骨折风险的能力。设有FLS与主要骨再骨折的3年风险降低约40%以及任何骨再骨折风险降低约30%相关。预防一次再骨折所需治疗的患者数量为20例。
FLS已被推广为二级骨折预防的最有效干预措施,虽然有证据表明设有FLS的机构中检查和治疗率有所提高,但只有少数研究直接考虑了骨折结局。因此,我们试图评估我们的FLS降低再骨折风险的能力。
对一家设有FLS的三级医院和一家没有FLS的三级医院急诊科在6个月期间接诊的所有年龄≥50岁的轻微创伤骨折(MTF)患者进行历史性队列研究。记录基线特征、死亡率和3年随访期间的MTF情况。
对设有FLS医院的515例患者和未设FLS医院的416例患者进行了研究。在3年期间,设有FLS医院的63/515(12%)例患者和未设FLS医院的70/416(17%)例患者发生了MTF。所有患者均按意向性分析进行分析,无论他们是否在FLS随访诊所就诊。在存在任何原因导致的死亡竞争风险的情况下,使用Cox比例风险模型进行统计分析。在对基线特征进行调整后,设有FLS医院的任何再骨折发生率降低了约30%(风险比(HR)0.67,置信区间(CI)0.47 - 0.95,p值0.025),主要再骨折(髋部、脊柱、股骨及骨盆或肱骨)发生率降低了约40%(HR 0.59,CI 0.39 - 0.90,p值0.013)。
我们发现,与类似的未设FLS医院相比,设有FLS医院的任何再骨折发生率降低了约30%,主要再骨折发生率降低了约40%。3年内预防一例新骨折所需治疗的患者数量为20例。