Barussaud M-L, Roussel B, Meurette G, Sulpice L, Meunier B, Regenet N, Bourbao-Tournois C, Huten N, Lhermite E, Paineau J, Durand-Fontanier S, Theraux J, Carretier M, Faure J P
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, University Hospital of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, University Hospital of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
J Visc Surg. 2016 Feb;153(1):15-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
Simulation as a method for practical teaching of surgical residents requires objective evaluation in order to measure the student's acquisition of knowledge and skills. The objectives of this article are to publish our evaluation and validation grids and also the measure of student satisfaction.
A teaching platform based on practical exercises with a porcine model was created in 2009 at seven French University Hospitals. Three times a year, 31 Diplôme d'Études Spécialisées Complémentaires (DESC) surgical residents underwent timed assessment of the performance of five surgical tasks: trocar insertion (trocars) testing the convergence of instruments (convergence), intra-corporeal knot tying (knots), running of the small intestine to find a lesion (exploration), and performance of a running suture closure of the peritoneum (closure). Two experts evaluated performances prospectively on grid score sheets specifically designed and validated for these exercises. We measured time, scores on a rating scale, and the interest and satisfaction of the residents.
Data for 31 residents between May 2011 and March 2012 were analyzed. Rating scales were statistically validated and correlated (Kappa correlation coefficient K>0.69) for each task. The performance times of the most experienced residents decreased significantly for all tasks except for small bowel exploration (P=0.2). After four sessions, times were significantly improved with better quality (fewer errors and higher average scores [>88%]), regardless of the residents' experience. Of the participants, 92% were satisfied, 86% thought that the sessions improved their technical skills and 74% thought it had a favorable impact on their clinical practice.
This study shows that the performance of surgical techniques can be improved through simulation, that HUFEG grids are valid, and that this teaching program is popular with surgical residents.
模拟作为外科住院医师实践教学的一种方法,需要进行客观评估,以衡量学生对知识和技能的掌握程度。本文的目的是公布我们的评估和验证标准,以及学生满意度的衡量结果。
2009年在法国七所大学医院创建了一个基于猪模型实践练习的教学平台。每年三次,31名补充专业研究文凭(DESC)外科住院医师接受五项外科手术任务的限时评估:套管针插入(套管针)、测试器械的汇聚(汇聚)、体内打结(打结)、小肠运行以寻找病变(探查)以及腹膜连续缝合关闭(关闭)。两名专家根据专门为这些练习设计和验证的评分表对表现进行前瞻性评估。我们测量了时间、评分量表得分以及住院医师的兴趣和满意度。
分析了2011年5月至2012年3月期间31名住院医师的数据。评分量表在统计学上得到验证,并且每项任务的评分量表之间具有相关性(卡帕相关系数K>0.69)。除小肠探查外,经验最丰富的住院医师在所有任务中的完成时间均显著缩短(P=0.2)。经过四次练习后,无论住院医师的经验如何,完成时间都显著缩短,质量也有所提高(错误减少,平均得分更高[>88%])。在参与者中,92%表示满意,86%认为这些练习提高了他们的技术技能,74%认为这对他们的临床实践产生了积极影响。
本研究表明,通过模拟可以提高外科技术的表现,HUFEG标准是有效的,并且该教学计划受到外科住院医师的欢迎。