Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, 1650, Cedar Avenue, L9. 313, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
The Henry K.M. DeKuyper Education Centre, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3009-3023. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6199-8. Epub 2018 May 3.
A needs assessment identified a gap in teaching and assessment of laparoscopic suturing (LS) skills. The purpose of this review is to identify assessment tools that were used to assess LS skills, to evaluate validity evidence available, and to provide guidance for selecting the right assessment tool for specific assessment conditions.
Bibliographic databases were searched till April 2017. Full-text articles were included if they reported on assessment tools used in the operating room/simulation to (1) assess procedures that require LS or (2) specifically assess LS skills.
Forty-two tools were identified, of which 26 were used for assessing LS skills specifically and 26 for procedures that require LS. Tools had the most evidence in internal structure and relationship to other variables, and least in consequences.
Through identification and evaluation of assessment tools, the results of this review could be used as a guideline when implementing assessment tools into training programs.
需求评估发现腹腔镜缝合 (LS) 技能的教学和评估存在差距。本综述的目的是确定用于评估 LS 技能的评估工具，评估可用的有效性证据，并为特定评估条件下选择正确的评估工具提供指导。
截至 2017 年 4 月，对文献数据库进行了检索。如果全文文章报告了在手术室/模拟中使用的评估工具（1）评估需要 LS 的程序，或（2）专门评估 LS 技能，则将其纳入。
确定了 42 种工具，其中 26 种专门用于评估 LS 技能，26 种用于需要 LS 的程序。工具在内部结构和与其他变量的关系方面具有最多的证据，而在后果方面最少。
通过识别和评估评估工具，本综述的结果可作为将评估工具纳入培训计划的指南。
