• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声检查在急性阑尾炎诊断中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。

Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study.

作者信息

Schwerk W B, Wichtrup B, Rothmund M, Rüschoff J

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 1989 Sep;97(3):630-9. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(89)90634-3.

DOI:10.1016/0016-5085(89)90634-3
PMID:2666252
Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy and practical impact of high-resolution sonography were prospectively studied in 523 consecutive patients admitted to the hospital with suspected appendicitis. The criteria for ultrasound diagnosis of acute appendicitis included visualization of a noncompressible aperistaltic appendix, with a targetlike appearance in transverse view and a diameter greater than or equal to 7 mm. In 115 of 130 patients with proven appendicitis the inflamed appendix or appendiceal abscess could be visualized, giving a sensitivity of 88.5%. The mean diameter of ultrasonically visible appendices was 11.4 +/- 3.2 mm. The overall accuracy and specificity of sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were 95.7% and 98%, respectively. The predictive value of a positive test was 94.5% and that of a negative result 96.3%. In a separate analysis of the results in 121 women of childbearing age, who have a high risk of preoperative misdiagnosis, the overall accuracy was found to be 96.7%, with 82.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Twenty-four (89%) of the 27 patients with appendiceal rupture (incidence 20.8%) were correctly diagnosed with ultrasound. The other 3 cases (11%) were missed. Routine use of ultrasonography has significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected appendicitis and has reduced the negative laparotomy rate from 22.9% to 13.2%.

摘要

对523例因疑似阑尾炎入院的连续患者进行了前瞻性研究,以评估高分辨率超声检查的诊断准确性及实际影响。急性阑尾炎的超声诊断标准包括:观察到不可压缩、无蠕动的阑尾,横切面上呈靶样外观,直径大于或等于7mm。130例经证实为阑尾炎的患者中,115例可见发炎的阑尾或阑尾脓肿,敏感性为88.5%。超声可见阑尾的平均直径为11.4±3.2mm。超声诊断急性阑尾炎的总体准确性和特异性分别为95.7%和98%。阳性检查的预测值为94.5%,阴性结果的预测值为96.3%。在对121例育龄期女性(术前误诊风险高)的结果进行单独分析时,发现总体准确性为96.7%,敏感性为82.6%,特异性为100%。27例阑尾破裂患者(发生率20.8%)中有24例(89%)通过超声得到正确诊断,另外3例(11%)漏诊。常规使用超声检查显著提高了疑似阑尾炎患者的诊断准确性,并将阴性剖腹率从22.9%降至13.2%。

相似文献

1
Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study.超声检查在急性阑尾炎诊断中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。
Gastroenterology. 1989 Sep;97(3):630-9. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(89)90634-3.
2
Acute and perforated appendicitis: current experience with ultrasound-aided diagnosis.急性穿孔性阑尾炎:超声辅助诊断的当前经验
World J Surg. 1990 Mar-Apr;14(2):271-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01664891.
3
[Sonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis--a prospective study].[超声检查在阑尾炎诊断中的应用——一项前瞻性研究]
Z Gastroenterol. 1988 Nov;26(11):708-14.
4
[Experimental ultrasound analysis of the appendix. Contribution to improving the diagnosis of acute inflammation in routine clinical practice].[阑尾的实验性超声分析。对在常规临床实践中改善急性炎症诊断的贡献]
Chirurg. 1989 Mar;60(3):172-7.
5
Ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a prospective multicenter trial. Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group.超声检查诊断急性阑尾炎:一项前瞻性多中心试验的结果。急性腹痛研究组
World J Surg. 1999 Feb;23(2):141-6. doi: 10.1007/pl00013165.
6
Acute appendicitis: MR imaging and sonographic correlation.急性阑尾炎:磁共振成像与超声检查的相关性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Mar;168(3):669-74. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.3.9057512.
7
[Ultrasonic diagnosis in appendiceal perforation].[阑尾穿孔的超声诊断]
Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax. 1990 Feb 6;79(6):135-9.
8
An overview of graded compression sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.分级加压超声检查在急性阑尾炎诊断中的概述。
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1989 Aug;10(4):352-63.
9
Sonographic diagnosis of perforation in patients with acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎患者穿孔的超声诊断
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Feb;154(2):275-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.154.2.2105013.
10
Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.超声检查在急性阑尾炎诊断中的应用
Br J Surg. 1991 Mar;78(3):315-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780316.

引用本文的文献

1
Perforated Appendicitis in a 23-Month-Old Child.一名23个月大儿童的穿孔性阑尾炎
Cureus. 2025 Apr 13;17(4):e82200. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82200. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
RIPASA and air scoring systems are superior to alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis: Diagnostic accuracy study.在急性阑尾炎中,RIPASA评分系统和AIR评分系统优于阿尔瓦拉多评分:诊断准确性研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Sep 24;59:138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.029. eCollection 2020 Nov.
3
Validity of predictive factors of acute complicated appendicitis.预测急性复杂性阑尾炎的有效性。
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Sep 26;11:48. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0107-0. eCollection 2016.
4
The utility of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in diagnosing acute appendicitis and staging its severity.声辐射力脉冲成像在诊断急性阑尾炎及其严重程度分期中的应用。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014 Nov;20(6):453-8. doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.13439.
5
Validation of the diagnostic score for acute lower abdominal pain in women of reproductive age.育龄期女性急性下腹痛诊断评分的验证
Emerg Med Int. 2014;2014:320926. doi: 10.1155/2014/320926. Epub 2014 May 25.
6
Combined use of modified Alvarado score and USG in decreasing negative appendicectomy rate.改良阿尔瓦拉多评分与超声检查联合使用以降低阴性阑尾切除术率。
Indian J Surg. 2010 Feb;72(1):42-8. doi: 10.1007/s12262-010-0008-5. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
7
Imaging of colonic diverticular disease.结肠憩室病的影像学检查
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2004 Aug;17(3):155-62. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-832696.
8
[Acute appendicitis. Modern diagnostics--surgical ultrasound].[急性阑尾炎。现代诊断方法——外科超声检查]
Chirurg. 2009 Jul;80(7):579-87. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1684-1.
9
Tc-99m-HMPAO white blood cell scan for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal clinical presentation.锝-99m-六甲基丙二胺肟白细胞扫描用于诊断临床表现不明确患者的急性阑尾炎。
Ann Surg. 1997 Jul;226(1):58-65. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199707000-00008.
10
Sonographic patterns in extranodal abdominal lymphomas.结外腹部淋巴瘤的超声表现
Eur Radiol. 1996;6(6):855-64. doi: 10.1007/BF00240690.