Setti Annalisa, Loughman James, Savva George M, Kenny RoseAnne
The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA), Trinity College Dublin , Dublin , Ireland ; School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork , Cork , Ireland.
Optometry Department, College of Sciences and Health, Dublin Institute of Technology , Dublin , Ireland ; African Vision Research Institute, Faculty of Sciences and Health, University of KwaZulu Natal , Durban , South Africa.
PeerJ. 2015 Dec 7;3:e1407. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1407. eCollection 2015.
Introduction. The determinant factors that influence self-reported quality of vision have yet to be fully elucidated. This study evaluated a range of contextual information, established psychophysical tests, and in particular, a series of cognitive tests as potentially novel determinant factors. Materials & Methods. Community dwelling adults (aged 50+) recruited to Wave 1 of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing, excluding those registered blind, participated in this study (N = 5,021). Self-reports of vision were analysed in relation to visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, ocular pathology, visual (Choice Response Time task; Trail Making Test) and global cognition. Contextual factors such as having visited an optometrist and wearing glasses were also considered. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine univariate and multivariate associations. Results and Discussion. Poor Trail Making Test performance (Odds ratio, OR = 1.36), visual acuity (OR = 1.72) and ocular pathology (OR = 2.25) were determinant factors for poor versus excellent vision in self-reports. Education, wealth, age, depressive symptoms and general cognitive fitness also contributed to determining self-reported vision. Conclusions. Trail Making Test contribution to self-reports may capture higher level visual processing and should be considered when using self-reports to assess vision and its role in cognitive and functional health.
引言。影响自我报告视力质量的决定因素尚未完全阐明。本研究评估了一系列背景信息、既定的心理物理学测试,特别是一系列认知测试,将其作为潜在的新型决定因素。材料与方法。招募爱尔兰纵向老龄化研究第一波中的社区居住成年人(50岁以上)参与本研究(N = 5,021),排除那些登记为盲人的个体。分析了与视力和对比敏感度、眼部病理学、视觉(选择反应时任务;连线测验)和整体认知相关的视力自我报告。还考虑了诸如是否看过验光师和是否戴眼镜等背景因素。使用有序逻辑回归来确定单变量和多变量关联。结果与讨论。连线测验表现不佳(比值比,OR = 1.36)、视力(OR = 1.72)和眼部病理学(OR = 2.25)是自我报告中视力差与视力好的决定因素。教育、财富、年龄、抑郁症状和一般认知健康状况也有助于确定自我报告的视力。结论。连线测验对自我报告的贡献可能反映了更高层次的视觉处理,在使用自我报告评估视力及其在认知和功能健康中的作用时应予以考虑。