Tiderington Emmy
Rutgers School of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 360 Dr. Martin Luther King Blvd., Hill Hall, Suite 401A, Newark, NJ, 07102-1801, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Jan;44(1):103-114. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0707-0.
This qualitative study examines the views and practices of frontline providers working in supportive housing for adults with serious mental illness and how frontline workers understand their work as it relates to consumer mental health recovery. Utilizing 84 interviews with providers (N = 35) and 106 hours of observation of provider practice, a grounded theory of frontline practice in supportive housing is provided. Analyses revealed distinct differences between providers working within transitional versus permanent housing programs in their orientation to recovery. Implications for the design of the supportive housing continuum of care are discussed.
这项定性研究考察了在为患有严重精神疾病的成年人提供支持性住房的机构中一线工作人员的观点和做法,以及一线工作人员如何理解他们的工作与消费者心理健康康复之间的关系。通过对工作人员进行84次访谈(N = 35)以及对工作人员的实践进行106小时的观察,得出了支持性住房一线实践的扎根理论。分析揭示了在过渡性住房项目与永久性住房项目中工作的工作人员在康复导向方面存在明显差异。讨论了对支持性住房连续护理设计的影响。