Tiderington Emmy
School of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 360 Dr. Martin Luther King Blvd., Hill Hall, Suite 401A, Newark, NJ, 07102-1801, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Jan;45(1):152-162. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0780-z.
This multi-method qualitative study examines frontline provider perspectives on consumer social relationships and barriers to social recovery in supportive housing programs for adults with serious mental illness. Thematic analyses show that guest and occupancy policies that enforce the "single" nature of single-adult supportive housing challenge consumer rights to self-determination in the realm of social recovery. Findings also highlight the ways in which providers act to reinforce and subvert these policies while mitigating risk in this service setting. Recommendations for enhancing the recovery orientation of supportive housing and implications for the design of the homeless service system are discussed.
这项多方法定性研究考察了一线服务提供者对于患有严重精神疾病的成年人在支持性住房项目中的社会关系及社会康复障碍的看法。主题分析表明，强化单人成年支持性住房“单人”性质的访客和入住政策，在社会康复领域对消费者的自决权构成了挑战。研究结果还凸显了服务提供者在该服务环境中强化和颠覆这些政策同时降低风险的方式。文中讨论了增强支持性住房康复导向的建议以及对无家可归者服务系统设计的启示。
