Fossey Ellie, Harvey Carol, McDermott Fiona
Department of Occupational Therapy, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Psychosocial Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 10;10:939. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00939. eCollection 2019.
Choice, control, privacy, and security are widely reported housing preferences of mental health consumers, are associated with improved well-being and greater housing satisfaction, and are important for recovery. This paper describes housing and neighborhood experiences from a larger qualitative study that sought to learn with people experiencing mental health issues about their everyday lives in an Australian urban community. A participatory approach to health research informed this study. A participatory reference group, including four people with consumer perspective knowledge and experience of mental health issues and four mental health practitioners with service provider and researcher perspectives, worked together to design and implement this study over a 4-year period. Thirty-nine participants were recruited, including 18 women and 21 men living in metropolitan Melbourne and receiving community mental health care for ongoing mental health issues related mainly to either psychotic or affective disorders. Participants each took part in one to three interviews or a focus group. The data were transcribed and analyzed using narrative and thematic analytic strategies, underpinned by reflective discussions with the participatory reference group. Participants' experiences of their housing and neighborhoods emphasized qualities that either contributed to or challenged their sense of being "at home." Identifying with a place as home was transformative, especially when supported by friendly neighborhood interactions, safety, and accessibility of local amenities. Unsatisfactory housing situations and limited income worked against participants' efforts to regain a sense of well-being and improve their situations. When being home was challenging, strategies used to counteract this included getting a pet and getting out as a means of resisting isolation at home. Differing views and ways of using the available support workers were described, suggesting tensions between seeking to be self-sufficient and valuing support. Social housing locations and housing-related support should explicitly attend to safety and security concerns. Collaborative care planning and outreach support should attend to supports for navigating issues with neighbors, housing, harnessing natural supports, and opportunities for being in others' company, as well as recognizing the importance of pets in people's lives. Understanding the strategies that mental health consumers find helpful in creating a sense of being at home, and the role of "place" in recovery merit further consideration in research and practice.
选择、控制权、隐私和安全是心理健康消费者广泛报告的住房偏好,与幸福感的提升和更高的住房满意度相关,对康复也很重要。本文描述了一项更大规模定性研究中的住房和社区经历,该研究旨在与有心理健康问题的人一起了解他们在澳大利亚城市社区的日常生活。一种参与式健康研究方法为这项研究提供了指导。一个参与式参考小组,包括四名具有心理健康问题消费者视角知识和经验的人和四名具有服务提供者和研究者视角的心理健康从业者,在四年时间里共同努力设计和实施了这项研究。招募了39名参与者,包括18名女性和21名男性,他们居住在墨尔本大都市,因主要与精神分裂症或情感障碍相关的持续心理健康问题而接受社区心理健康护理。每位参与者参加了一到三次访谈或一次焦点小组讨论。数据被转录并使用叙事和主题分析策略进行分析,这些策略以与参与式参考小组的反思性讨论为基础。参与者对其住房和社区的经历强调了有助于或挑战他们“在家”感觉 的特质。将一个地方认同为家具有变革性,特别是当有友好的邻里互动、安全以及当地便利设施的可及性作为支撑时。不令人满意的住房状况和有限的收入不利于参与者恢复幸福感和改善自身状况的努力。当在家变得具有挑战性时,用来应对这种情况的策略包括养宠物和出门,以此作为在家中抵御孤独的方式。文中描述了对现有支持人员的不同看法和使用方式,这表明在寻求自给自足和重视支持之间存在紧张关系。社会住房地点和与住房相关的支持应明确关注安全和保障问题。协作式护理规划和外展支持应关注在与邻居、住房相关问题上提供支持、利用自然支持以及有他人陪伴的机会,同时认识到宠物在人们生活中的重要性。了解心理健康消费者认为有助于营造在家感觉的策略,以及“地方”在康复中的作用,值得在研究和实践中进一步考虑。