Shinn Marybeth
Department of Human and Organizational Development, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, #90, 230 Appleton Place, Nashville, TN, 37203-5721, USA,
Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Jun;55(3-4):243-52. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9713-3.
What makes for a good life? The capabilities approach to this question has much to offer community psychology, particularly with respect to marginalized groups. Capabilities are freedoms to engage in valued social activities and roles-what people can do and be given both their capacities, and environmental opportunities and constraints. Economist Amartya Sen's focus on freedoms and agency resonates with psychological calls for empowerment, and philosopher Martha Nussbaum's specification of requirements for a life that is fully human provides an important guide for social programs. Community psychology's focus on mediating structures has much to offer the capabilities approach. Parallels between capabilities, as enumerated by Nussbaum, and settings that foster positive youth development, as described in a National Research Council Report (Eccles and Gootman (Eds) in Community programs to promote youth development. National Academy Press, Washington, 2002) suggest extensions of the approach to children. Community psychologists can contribute to theory about ways to create and modify settings to enhance capabilities as well as empowerment and positive youth development. Finally, capabilities are difficult to measure, because they involve freedoms to choose but only choices actually made or enacted can be observed. The variation in activities or goals across members of a setting provides a measure of the capabilities that the setting fosters.
怎样才是美好的生活?能力路径对这个问题的探讨能为社区心理学提供很多启示,尤其是对于边缘化群体而言。能力是参与有价值的社会活动和扮演各种角色的自由——即人们基于自身能力、环境机会和限制所能做到的事情以及所能成为的样子。经济学家阿玛蒂亚·森对自由和能动性的关注与心理学中对赋权的呼吁相呼应,哲学家玛莎·努斯鲍姆对充实人生所需条件的阐述为社会项目提供了重要指导。社区心理学对中介结构的关注能为能力路径提供很多借鉴。努斯鲍姆列举的能力与美国国家研究委员会一份报告(埃克尔斯和古特曼(编),《促进青少年发展的社区项目》,美国国家科学院出版社,华盛顿,2002年)中描述的促进青少年积极发展的环境之间存在相似之处,这表明该路径可扩展至儿童群体。社区心理学家可以为关于如何创建和改变环境以增强能力、赋权以及促进青少年积极发展的理论做出贡献。最后,能力难以衡量,因为它们涉及选择的自由,但只能观察到实际做出或实施的选择。环境中成员在活动或目标上的差异为该环境所培育的能力提供了一种衡量方式。