Imai A, Kaneoka K, Okubo Y, Shiraki H
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Faculty of Health and Medical Care, School of Physical Therapy, Saitama Medical University, Japan.
Int J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;37(3):197-201. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1559714. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
The aim of this study was to investigate the immediate effects of trunk stabilization exercise (SE) and conventional trunk exercise (CE) programs on jump performance. 13 adolescent male soccer players performed 2 kinds of jump testing before and immediate after 3 experimental conditions: SE, CE, and non-exercise (NE). The SE program consisted of the elbow-toe, hand-knee, and back bridge, and the CE program consisted of the sit-up, sit-up with trunk rotation and back extension. Testing of a countermovement jump (CMJ) and rebound jump (RJ) were performed to assess jump performance. Jump height of the CMJ and RJ-index, contact time, and jump height of the RJ were analyzed. The RJ index was improved significantly only after SE (p=0.017). However, contact time and jump height did not improve significantly in the SE condition. Moreover, no significant interaction or main effects of time or group were observed in the CMJ. Consequently, this study showed the different immediate effect on the RJ between the SE and CE, and suggested the possibility that the SE used in this study is useful as a warm-up program to improve the explosive movements.
本研究的目的是调查躯干稳定训练(SE)和传统躯干训练(CE)计划对跳跃成绩的即时影响。13名青少年男性足球运动员在3种实验条件(SE、CE和非运动(NE))之前和之后立即进行了2种跳跃测试。SE计划包括肘碰脚尖、手膝支撑和背桥动作,CE计划包括仰卧起坐、转体仰卧起坐和背部伸展。进行了反向纵跳(CMJ)和反弹跳(RJ)测试以评估跳跃成绩。分析了CMJ的跳跃高度、RJ指数、接触时间和RJ的跳跃高度。仅在SE后RJ指数有显著提高(p = 0.017)。然而,在SE条件下接触时间和跳跃高度没有显著改善。此外,在CMJ中未观察到时间或组别的显著交互作用或主效应。因此,本研究显示了SE和CE对RJ的即时影响不同,并表明本研究中使用的SE作为热身计划来改善爆发性动作的可能性。