Cosman Joshua D, Arita Jason T, Ianni Julianna D, Woodman Geoffrey F
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Psychophysiology. 2016 Apr;53(4):535-43. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12594. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
The temporal relationship between different stages of cognitive processing is long debated. This debate is ongoing, primarily because it is often difficult to measure the time course of multiple cognitive processes simultaneously. We employed a manipulation that allowed us to isolate ERP components related to perceptual processing, working memory, and response preparation, and then examined the temporal relationship between these components while observers performed a visual search task. We found that, when response speed and accuracy were equally stressed, our index of perceptual processing ended before both the transfer of information into working memory and response preparation began. However, when we stressed speed over accuracy, response preparation began before the completion of perceptual processing or transfer of information into working memory on trials with the fastest reaction times. These findings show that individuals can control the flow of information transmission between stages, either waiting for perceptual processing to be completed before preparing a response or configuring these stages to overlap in time.
认知加工不同阶段之间的时间关系一直备受争议。这场争论仍在继续,主要是因为通常很难同时测量多个认知过程的时间进程。我们采用了一种操作方法,使我们能够分离出与知觉加工、工作记忆和反应准备相关的事件相关电位(ERP)成分,然后在观察者执行视觉搜索任务时,研究这些成分之间的时间关系。我们发现,当同等强调反应速度和准确性时,我们的知觉加工指标在信息转入工作记忆和反应准备开始之前就结束了。然而,当我们更强调速度而非准确性时,在反应时间最快的试验中,反应准备在知觉加工完成或信息转入工作记忆之前就开始了。这些发现表明,个体可以控制不同阶段之间的信息传输流程,要么在准备反应之前等待知觉加工完成,要么使这些阶段在时间上重叠。