Roller Devin G, Capaldo Brian, Bekiranov Stefan, Mackey Aaron J, Conaway Mark R, Petricoin Emanuel F, Gioeli Daniel, Weber Michael J
Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908 USA.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908 USA.
Oncotarget. 2016 Jan 19;7(3):2734-53. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6548.
Over half of BRAFV600E melanomas display intrinsic resistance to BRAF inhibitors, in part due to adaptive signaling responses. In this communication we ask whether BRAFV600E melanomas share common adaptive responses to BRAF inhibition that can provide clinically relevant targets for drug combinations. We screened a panel of 12 treatment-naïve BRAFV600E melanoma cell lines with MAP Kinase pathway inhibitors in pairwise combination with 58 signaling inhibitors, assaying for synergistic cytotoxicity. We found enormous diversity in the drug combinations that showed synergy, with no two cell lines having an identical profile. Although the 6 lines most resistant to BRAF inhibition showed synergistic benefit from combination with lapatinib, the signaling mechanisms by which this combination generated synergistic cytotoxicity differed between the cell lines. We conclude that adaptive responses to inhibition of the primary oncogenic driver (BRAFV600E) are determined not only by the primary oncogenic driver but also by diverse secondary genetic and epigenetic changes ("back-seat drivers") and hence optimal drug combinations will be variable. Because upregulation of receptor tyrosine kinases is a major source of drug resistance arising from diverse adaptive responses, we propose that inhibitors of these receptors may have substantial clinical utility in combination with inhibitors of the MAP Kinase pathway.
超过半数的BRAFV600E黑色素瘤对BRAF抑制剂表现出内在抗性,部分原因是适应性信号转导反应。在本通讯中,我们探讨BRAFV600E黑色素瘤是否对BRAF抑制具有共同的适应性反应,从而为联合用药提供具有临床相关性的靶点。我们用丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAP)激酶途径抑制剂与58种信号转导抑制剂两两组合,筛选了一组12个未经治疗的BRAFV600E黑色素瘤细胞系,检测协同细胞毒性。我们发现显示协同作用的药物组合具有极大的多样性,没有两个细胞系具有相同的特征。尽管对BRAF抑制最具抗性的6个细胞系与拉帕替尼联合使用显示出协同益处,但该组合产生协同细胞毒性的信号转导机制在不同细胞系之间存在差异。我们得出结论,对主要致癌驱动因子(BRAFV600E)抑制的适应性反应不仅由主要致癌驱动因子决定,还由多种次要的基因和表观遗传变化(“后座驱动因子”)决定,因此最佳的联合用药方案将因人而异。由于受体酪氨酸激酶的上调是多种适应性反应产生耐药性的主要来源,我们提出这些受体的抑制剂与MAP激酶途径抑制剂联合使用可能具有重大临床应用价值。