Sabhlok Samrat, Kenjale Prachi, Mony Deepthi, Khatri Isha, Kumar Pratiksha
Reader, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dr D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital , Pune, Maharashtra, India .
Dental Surgeon, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Nov;9(11):ZC48-51. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13930.6813. Epub 2015 Nov 1.
Surgical removal of impacted third molar is the most commonly performed dento-alveolar procedure and is associated with post-operative pain, swelling and trismus.
The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of dexamethasone administered orally with that of dexamethasone administered as an intra-masseteric injection in surgical removal of mandibular third molars.
Sixty patients with impacted mandibular third molars were selected to undergo surgical removal of mandibular third molars. They were divided into three groups of twenty each, viz., Control Group, Group taking Oral dexamethasone and Group taking Intra-masseteric dexamethasone. Evaluation was done over a period of seven days postoperatively to study the effects of the drug in terms of swelling, trismus and pain.
ANOVA test was done and comparisons were made. It was found that there was a statistically significant difference with respect to the group taking oral dexamethasone in terms of resolution of trismus. It was also found that there was no statistical significance with respect to reduction in swelling in either of the groups.
Thus, it can be concluded that the oral route is superior compared to the intramuscular route when administering dexamethasone in surgical removal of mandibular third molars, with respect to drug dosage, bio-availability and resolution of trismus.
外科拔除阻生第三磨牙是最常见的牙槽外科手术,术后会出现疼痛、肿胀和牙关紧闭。
本研究的目的是比较口服地塞米松与在咬肌内注射地塞米松在外科拔除下颌第三磨牙中的疗效。
选取60例下颌阻生第三磨牙患者接受下颌第三磨牙拔除术。他们被分为三组,每组20人,即对照组、口服地塞米松组和咬肌内地塞米松注射组。术后7天进行评估,以研究药物在肿胀、牙关紧闭和疼痛方面的效果。
进行方差分析并作比较。结果发现,口服地塞米松组在牙关紧闭的缓解方面存在统计学显著差异。还发现,两组在肿胀减轻方面均无统计学意义。
因此,可以得出结论,在外科拔除下颌第三磨牙时,就药物剂量、生物利用度和牙关紧闭的缓解而言,口服途径优于肌内注射途径。