• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

IS GUTTACORE MORE EASILY REMOVED FROM THE ROOT CANAL THAN THERMAFIL? AN EX-VIVO STUDY.

作者信息

Nevares Giselle, de Albuquerque Diana Santana, Bueno Carlos Eduardo da Silveira, Cunha Rodrigo Sanches

机构信息

University of Pernambuco, Avenida Gal Newton Cavalcanti, Tabatinga, Camaragibe, PE, Brazil.

出版信息

J Can Dent Assoc. 2015;81:f22.

PMID:26679336
Abstract

GuttaCore is a new cross-linked gutta-percha carrier. Its handling time and ease of removal were compared with those of a plastic carrier (Thermafil) and the continuous wave of condensation technique (control). Forty-five maxillary central incisors were randomly divided 3 groups according to filling technique and retreatment was carried out in all samples with NiTi rotary files, hand files and ultrasonic inserts. Time required for filling removal was recorded. Roots were then split longitudinally and photographed under 5x magnification, and residual filling material was quantified. Removal time was significantly longer for Thermafil (7.10 minutes) than GuttaCore (2.91 minutes) and the control group (1.93 minutes) (p < 0.001). The amount of residual filling material did not differ among the groups: Thermafil 8.31%, GuttaCore 6.27 and control 8.68% (p > 0.05). In conclusion, replacing plastic core with cross-linked gutta-percha allows easier removal of carrier from the root canal. The remnants of filling material in all samples illustrate that retreatment remains a challenge in endodontics.

摘要

相似文献

1
IS GUTTACORE MORE EASILY REMOVED FROM THE ROOT CANAL THAN THERMAFIL? AN EX-VIVO STUDY.
J Can Dent Assoc. 2015;81:f22.
2
Time required to remove guttacore, thermafil plus, and thermoplasticized gutta-percha from moderately curved root canals with protaper files.用 Protaper 锉去除中度弯曲根管中的 guttacore、Thermafil Plus 和塑化热牙胶所需的时间。
J Endod. 2013 Jan;39(1):125-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.014. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
3
Efficacy of the ProTaper retreatment system in removing Thermafil, GuttaCore or vertically compacted gutta-percha from curved root canals assessed by micro-CT.采用微 CT 评估 ProTaper 再治疗系统去除弯曲根管中 Thermafil、GuttaCore 或垂直压缩牙胶的效果。
Int Endod J. 2018 Jul;51(7):808-815. doi: 10.1111/iej.12893. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
4
Effectiveness of three different retreatment techniques in canals filled with compacted gutta-percha or Thermafil: a scanning electron microscope study.三种不同再治疗技术在充填有压实牙胶或热牙胶尖根管中的效果:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Endod. 2009 Oct;35(10):1433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
5
Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal.与一种旋转再治疗系统相比,两种往复式系统去除牙胶的疗效。
J Endod. 2014 Apr;40(4):543-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.013. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
6
Effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for removing a new synthetic polymer-based root canal obturation material (Epiphany) during retreatment.在根管再治疗过程中,手用器械和旋转器械去除新型合成聚合物基根管充填材料(Epiphany)的效果。
Int Endod J. 2006 Feb;39(2):150-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01066.x.
7
GuttaCore Pink, Thermafil and Warm Vertically compacted gutta-percha retreatment: Time required and quantitative evaluation by using ProTaper files.GuttaCore Pink、Thermafil 和 Warm 垂直压缩牙胶再治疗:使用 Protaper 文件评估所需时间和定量评估。
Dent Mater J. 2020 Mar 31;39(2):229-235. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-008. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
8
Comparison of ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment systems in the removal of resin-based root canal obturation materials during retreatment.ProTaper和Mtwo再治疗系统在根管再治疗过程中去除树脂类根管充填材料的比较。
Aust Endod J. 2014 Apr;40(1):6-11. doi: 10.1111/aej.12011. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
9
Efficacy of ProTaper Universal Rotary Retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from oval root canals: a micro-computed tomography study.ProTaper Universal 旋转根管再治疗系统去除椭圆形根管内牙胶的效果:一项微计算机断层扫描研究。
J Endod. 2012 Nov;38(11):1516-20. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
10
Micro-computed tomography analysis of post space preparation in root canals filled with carrier-based thermoplasticized gutta-percha.基于载体的热塑牙胶充填根管后根管预备空间的微计算机断层扫描分析
Int Endod J. 2017 Mar;50(3):293-302. doi: 10.1111/iej.12618. Epub 2016 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative pain intensity and incidence following single visit root canal treatment with different obturation techniques: a randomized clinical trial.单次就诊根管治疗不同充填技术后的术后疼痛强度和发生率:一项随机临床试验。
PeerJ. 2022 Jul 27;10:e13756. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13756. eCollection 2022.
2
Efficacy of Removing Thermafil and GuttaCore from Straight Root Canal Systems Using a Novel Non-Surgical Root Canal Re-Treatment System: A Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis.使用新型非手术根管再治疗系统从直根管系统中取出Thermafil和GuttaCore的疗效:微计算机断层扫描分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 18;10(6):1266. doi: 10.3390/jcm10061266.