Poletti Martina, Aytekin Murat, Rucci Michele
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Curr Biol. 2015 Dec 21;25(24):3253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
Humans explore static visual scenes by alternating rapid eye movements (saccades) with periods of slow and incessant eye drifts [1-3]. These drifts are commonly believed to be the consequence of physiological limits in maintaining steady gaze, resulting in Brownian-like trajectories [4-7], which are almost independent in the two eyes [8-10]. However, because of the technical difficulty of recording minute eye movements, most knowledge on ocular drift comes from artificial laboratory conditions, in which the head of the observer is strictly immobilized. Little is known about eye drift during natural head-free fixation, when microscopic head movements are also continually present [11-13]. We have recently observed that the power spectrum of the visual input to the retina during ocular drift is largely unaffected by fixational head movements [14]. Here we elucidate the mechanism responsible for this invariance. We show that, contrary to common assumption, ocular drift does not move the eyes randomly, but compensates for microscopic head movements, thereby yielding highly correlated movements in the two eyes. This compensatory behavior is extremely fast, persists with one eye patched, and results in image motion trajectories that are only partially correlated on the two retinas. These findings challenge established views of how humans acquire visual information. They show that ocular drift is precisely controlled, as long speculated [15], and imply the existence of neural mechanisms that integrate minute multimodal signals.
人类通过快速眼动(扫视)与缓慢且持续的眼球漂移交替来探索静态视觉场景[1-3]。这些漂移通常被认为是维持稳定注视时生理极限的结果,从而产生类似布朗运动的轨迹[4-7],两眼的轨迹几乎相互独立[8-10]。然而,由于记录微小眼球运动存在技术困难,关于眼球漂移的大多数知识都来自人工实验室条件,即观察者的头部被严格固定。对于自然无头部固定状态下的眼球漂移知之甚少,此时微观头部运动也持续存在[11-13]。我们最近观察到,眼球漂移期间视网膜视觉输入的功率谱在很大程度上不受注视性头部运动的影响[14]。在此我们阐明造成这种不变性的机制。我们表明,与通常的假设相反,眼球漂移并非随机移动眼睛,而是补偿微观头部运动,从而使两眼产生高度相关的运动。这种补偿行为极其迅速,在单眼遮盖时依然存在,并且导致图像运动轨迹在两眼视网膜上仅部分相关。这些发现挑战了关于人类如何获取视觉信息的既定观点。它们表明眼球漂移如长期以来所推测的那样受到精确控制[15],并暗示存在整合微小多模态信号的神经机制。