Suppr超能文献

静脉途径噬菌体疗法的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of phage therapy via the intravenous route.

作者信息

Speck Peter, Smithyman Anthony

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia

School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.

出版信息

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016 Feb;363(3). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnv242. Epub 2015 Dec 20.

Abstract

Increasing development of antimicrobial resistance is driving a resurgence in interest in phage therapy: the use of bacteriophages to treat bacterial infections. As the lytic action of bacteriophages is unaffected by the antibiotic resistance status of their bacterial target, it is thought that phage therapy may have considerable potential in the treatment of a wide range of topical and localized infections. As yet this interest has not extended to intravenous (IV) use, which is surprising given that the historical record shows that phages are likely to be safe and effective when delivered by this route. Starting almost 100 years ago, phages were administered intravenously in treatment of systemic infections including typhoid, and Staphylococcal bacteremia. There was extensive IV use of phages in the 1940s to treat typhoid, reportedly with outstanding efficacy and safety. The safety of IV phage administration is also underpinned by the detailed work of Ochs and colleagues in Seattle who have over four decades' experience with IV injection into human subjects of large doses of highly purified coliphage PhiX174. Though these subjects included a large number of immune-deficient children, no serious side effects were observed over this extended time period. The large and continuing global health problems of typhoid and Staphylococcus aureus are exacerbated by the increasing antibiotic resistance of these pathogens. We contend that these infections are excellent candidates for use of IV phage therapy.

摘要

抗菌耐药性的不断发展促使人们对噬菌体疗法重新产生兴趣

即利用噬菌体治疗细菌感染。由于噬菌体的裂解作用不受其细菌靶标抗生素耐药性状态的影响,人们认为噬菌体疗法在治疗多种局部和局限性感染方面可能具有巨大潜力。然而,这种兴趣尚未扩展到静脉内(IV)使用,鉴于历史记录表明噬菌体通过这种途径给药可能是安全有效的,这一点令人惊讶。从近100年前开始,噬菌体就被静脉内给药用于治疗包括伤寒和葡萄球菌菌血症在内的全身性感染。在20世纪40年代,人们广泛静脉内使用噬菌体治疗伤寒,据报道疗效和安全性都非常出色。西雅图的奥克斯及其同事的详细研究也证实了静脉内注射噬菌体的安全性,他们在向人类受试者静脉内注射大剂量高度纯化的大肠杆菌噬菌体PhiX174方面拥有超过四十年的经验。尽管这些受试者包括大量免疫缺陷儿童,但在这段较长时间内未观察到严重的副作用。伤寒和金黄色葡萄球菌在全球范围内造成的巨大且持续的健康问题因这些病原体抗生素耐药性的增加而加剧。我们认为这些感染是静脉内使用噬菌体疗法的理想候选对象。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验