Curtis James A, Laus Joey, Yung Katherine C, Courey Mark S
UCSF Voice and Swallowing Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2016 Oct;126(10):2291-4. doi: 10.1002/lary.25828. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the sensitivity and specificity for assessing pharyngeal residue, laryngeal penetration, and tracheal aspiration when comparing findings from the Static Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (SEES) with findings from the Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study (VFSS).
Retrospective study at a tertiary academic medical center. Records were reviewed consecutive outpatients who underwent both SEES and VFSS evaluations. Video segments from SEES and VFSS examinations were blindly judged by experienced clinicians on a categorical/ordinal rating form for the absence, quantitative presence, and location of postswallow residue, penetration, and aspiration. Statistical analysis was performed to identify intra- and interrater reliability and correlation between SEES and VFSS findings.
Thirty-nine patients were identified who met the above inclusion criteria, for a total of 206 video segments. Inter- and intrarater reliability was judged by Cronbach's alpha to be good to excellent. SEES findings revealed statistically significant correlations with VFSS findings (P < 0.001) with the absence, quantitative presence, and location of thin liquid and solid swallow residue, penetration, and aspiration. In addition, SEES was more sensitive to the presence of liquid residue, penetration, and aspiration than VFSS.
SEES is an endoscopic screening procedure that strengthens the clinical swallowing evaluation by documenting the presence or absence of postswallow residue, penetration, and aspiration. Accurate identification of a patient's risk for aspiration helps to direct further workup. It is an expedient, repeatable, and clinical relevant procedure that can be easily incorporated into a clinician's practice.
目的/假设:在比较吞咽静态内镜评估(SEES)与电视荧光吞咽造影研究(VFSS)的结果时,确定评估咽部残留、喉穿透和气管误吸的敏感性和特异性。
在一家三级学术医疗中心进行回顾性研究。回顾了连续接受SEES和VFSS评估的门诊患者的记录。经验丰富的临床医生根据分类/序数评分表,对SEES和VFSS检查的视频片段进行盲法判断,以确定吞咽后残留、穿透和误吸的有无、定量情况及位置。进行统计分析以确定评估者内和评估者间的可靠性以及SEES和VFSS结果之间的相关性。
确定了39名符合上述纳入标准的患者,共206个视频片段。通过Cronbach's α系数判断,评估者间和评估者内的可靠性为良好至优秀。SEES结果显示,与VFSS结果在稀薄液体和固体吞咽残留、穿透和误吸的有无、定量情况及位置方面存在统计学显著相关性(P < 0.001)。此外,SEES对液体残留、穿透和误吸的存在比VFSS更敏感。
SEES是一种内镜筛查程序,通过记录吞咽后残留、穿透和误吸的有无,加强了临床吞咽评估。准确识别患者的误吸风险有助于指导进一步的检查。它是一种便捷、可重复且与临床相关的程序,可轻松纳入临床医生的实践中。
4。《喉镜》,126:2291 - 2294,2016年。