Reed Andra J, Thompson Anne M, Kollonige Debra E, Martins Douglas K, Tzortziou Maria A, Herman Jay R, Berkoff Timothy A, Abuhassan Nader K, Cede Alexander
Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA.
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD USA ; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD USA.
J Atmos Chem. 2015;72(3-4):455-482. doi: 10.1007/s10874-013-9254-9. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
An analysis is presented for both ground- and satellite-based retrievals of total column ozone and nitrogen dioxide levels from the Washington, D.C., and Baltimore, Maryland, metropolitan area during the NASA-sponsored July 2011 campaign of eriving nformation on urface nditions from Column and tically Resolved Observations Relevant to ir uality (DISCOVER-AQ). Satellite retrievals of total column ozone and nitrogen dioxide from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on the Aura satellite are used, while Pandora spectrometers provide total column ozone and nitrogen dioxide amounts from the ground. We found that OMI and Pandora agree well (residuals within ±25 % for nitrogen dioxide, and ±4.5 % for ozone) for a majority of coincident observations during July 2011. Comparisons with surface nitrogen dioxide from a Teledyne API 200 EU NO Analyzer showed nitrogen dioxide diurnal variability that was consistent with measurements by Pandora. However, the wide OMI field of view, clouds, and aerosols affected retrievals on certain days, resulting in differences between Pandora and OMI of up to ±65 % for total column nitrogen dioxide, and ±23 % for total column ozone. As expected, significant cloud cover (cloud fraction >0.2) was the most important parameter affecting comparisons of ozone retrievals; however, small, passing cumulus clouds that do not coincide with a high (>0.2) cloud fraction, or low aerosol layers which cause significant backscatter near the ground affected the comparisons of total column nitrogen dioxide retrievals. Our results will impact post-processing satellite retrieval algorithms and quality control procedures.
本文对美国国家航空航天局(NASA)2011年7月发起的“利用与大气现实相关的柱面和垂直分辨观测获取地表状况信息(DISCOVER - AQ)”活动期间,华盛顿特区和马里兰州巴尔的摩大都市区地面和卫星反演的总柱状臭氧和二氧化氮水平进行了分析。利用了搭载在Aura卫星上的臭氧监测仪器(OMI)对总柱状臭氧和二氧化氮的卫星反演数据,同时潘多拉光谱仪提供了地面的总柱状臭氧和二氧化氮含量。我们发现,对于2011年7月的大多数同步观测,OMI和潘多拉的数据吻合良好(二氧化氮的残差在±25%以内,臭氧的残差在±4.5%以内)。与Teledyne API 200 EU NO分析仪的地表二氧化氮数据比较显示,二氧化氮的日变化与潘多拉的测量结果一致。然而,OMI的宽视场、云层和气溶胶在某些日子影响了反演结果,导致总柱状二氧化氮的潘多拉和OMI数据差异高达±65%,总柱状臭氧的差异高达±23%。正如预期的那样,显著的云层覆盖(云量分数>0.2)是影响臭氧反演比较的最重要参数;然而,与高云量分数(>0.2)不重合的小积云或在地面附近引起显著后向散射的低气溶胶层影响了总柱状二氧化氮反演的比较。我们的结果将影响卫星反演算法的后处理和质量控制程序。