Suppr超能文献

迈向生物炭分析标准化:COST行动TD1107实验室间比对

Toward the Standardization of Biochar Analysis: The COST Action TD1107 Interlaboratory Comparison.

作者信息

Bachmann Hans Jörg, Bucheli Thomas D, Dieguez-Alonso Alba, Fabbri Daniele, Knicker Heike, Schmidt Hans-Peter, Ulbricht Axel, Becker Roland, Buscaroli Alessandro, Buerge Diane, Cross Andrew, Dickinson Dane, Enders Akio, Esteves Valdemar I, Evangelou Michael W H, Fellet Guido, Friedrich Kevin, Gasco Guerrero Gabriel, Glaser Bruno, Hanke Ulrich M, Hanley Kelly, Hilber Isabel, Kalderis Dimitrios, Leifeld Jens, Masek Ondrej, Mumme Jan, Carmona Marina Paneque, Calvelo Pereira Roberto, Rees Frederic, Rombolà Alessandro G, de la Rosa José Maria, Sakrabani Ruben, Sohi Saran, Soja Gerhard, Valagussa Massimo, Verheijen Frank, Zehetner Franz

机构信息

Agroscope Institute for Sustainability Sciences ISS , Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zürich, Switzerland.

Technical University Berlin , Fasanenstraße 89, 10623 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Agric Food Chem. 2016 Jan 20;64(2):513-27. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05055. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

Abstract

Biochar produced by pyrolysis of organic residues is increasingly used for soil amendment and many other applications. However, analytical methods for its physical and chemical characterization are yet far from being specifically adapted, optimized, and standardized. Therefore, COST Action TD1107 conducted an interlaboratory comparison in which 22 laboratories from 12 countries analyzed three different types of biochar for 38 physical-chemical parameters (macro- and microelements, heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, pH, electrical conductivity, and specific surface area) with their preferential methods. The data were evaluated in detail using professional interlaboratory testing software. Whereas intralaboratory repeatability was generally good or at least acceptable, interlaboratory reproducibility was mostly not (20% < mean reproducibility standard deviation < 460%). This paper contributes to better comparability of biochar data published already and provides recommendations to improve and harmonize specific methods for biochar analysis in the future.

摘要

通过有机残留物热解产生的生物炭越来越多地用于土壤改良和许多其他应用。然而,其物理和化学特性的分析方法远未得到专门的调整、优化和标准化。因此,COST行动TD1107进行了一项实验室间比较,来自12个国家的22个实验室用各自偏爱的方法分析了三种不同类型的生物炭的38个物理化学参数(常量和微量元素、重金属、多环芳烃、pH值、电导率和比表面积)。使用专业的实验室间测试软件对数据进行了详细评估。虽然实验室内的重复性总体良好或至少可以接受,但实验室间的再现性大多不行(平均再现性标准偏差在20%< 460%之间)。本文有助于提高已发表的生物炭数据的可比性,并为未来改进和统一生物炭分析的特定方法提供建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验