Suppr超能文献

巨大颅内动静脉畸形患者的长期预后

Long-term Outcomes of Patients With Giant Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations.

作者信息

Yang Wuyang, Wei Zhikui, Wang Joanna Y, Hung Alice L, Caplan Justin M, Braileanu Maria, Colby Geoffrey P, Coon Alexander L, Tamargo Rafael J, Huang Judy

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2016 Jul;79(1):116-24. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001189.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Giant intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are rare cerebrovascular lesions that pose management challenges.

OBJECTIVE

To further clarify outcomes in patients with giant cerebral AVMs managed with conservative or interventional therapies.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with AVMs evaluated at our institution from 1990 to 2013. Patients with a single intracranial AVM >6 cm were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: conservative management or intervention (microsurgery, radiosurgery, or embolization). Functional outcome was assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients with giant AVMs were included, and 35 patients (63.6%) had clinical follow-up with a mean of 11.8 years. Spetzler-Martin grades were as follows: grade III, n = 2 (3.6%); grade IV, n = 15 (27.3%); and grade V, n = 38 (69.1%). Twenty-four patients (43.6%) were conservatively managed. The patients in the conservatively managed group had larger AVMs (P < .05) with more frequent involvement of the temporal lobe (P = .02). Five patients (26.3%) in the conservatively managed group and 5 (31.3%) in the intervention group experienced hemorrhage during follow-up, translating to an annualized risk of 2.7% and 4.1%, respectively. No significant difference in risk of first subsequent hemorrhage was observed (P = .78). Despite comparable mRS scores at presentation, we observed a trend toward better outcomes (mRS < 2) in patients undergoing conservative management (P = .06) compared with the intervention group at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that interventions for giant AVMs should be considered cautiously because hemorrhagic risk is similar regardless of management strategy and functional outcome is likely to be same or better in the conservatively managed population.

ABBREVIATIONS

AVM, arteriovenous malformationmRS, modified Rankin Scale.

摘要

背景

巨大颅内动静脉畸形(AVM)是罕见的脑血管病变,给治疗带来挑战。

目的

进一步明确采用保守或介入治疗的巨大脑AVM患者的治疗结果。

方法

我们对1990年至2013年在我院评估的所有诊断为AVM的患者进行了回顾性研究。纳入单发性颅内AVM直径>6 cm的患者。患者分为两组:保守治疗或干预(显微手术、放射外科或栓塞)。采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评估功能结局,并在两组之间进行比较。

结果

共纳入55例巨大AVM患者,35例(63.6%)进行了临床随访,平均随访时间为11.8年。Spetzler-Martin分级如下:Ⅲ级,n = 2(3.6%);Ⅳ级,n = 15(27.3%);Ⅴ级,n = 38(69.1%)。24例(43.6%)患者接受保守治疗。保守治疗组患者的AVM更大(P <.05),颞叶受累更频繁(P =.02)。保守治疗组5例(26.3%)患者和干预组5例(31.3%)患者在随访期间发生出血,年出血风险分别为2.7%和4.1%。首次后续出血风险无显著差异(P =.78)。尽管两组患者就诊时mRS评分相当,但在末次随访时,我们观察到保守治疗患者(P =.06)与干预组相比有更好结局(mRS < 2)的趋势。

结论

本研究表明,巨大AVM的干预应谨慎考虑,因为无论治疗策略如何,出血风险相似,且保守治疗人群的功能结局可能相同或更好。

缩写

AVM,动静脉畸形;mRS,改良Rankin量表

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验