Centre for Clinical Education, Capital Region and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nordsjaelland's Hospital Hillerød, Denmark.
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):69-78. doi: 10.1111/medu.12814.
This study is designed to provide an overview of why, how, when and for whom collaborative learning of clinical skills may work in health professions education.
Collaborative learning of clinical skills may influence learning positively according to the non-medical literature. Training efficiency may therefore be improved if the outcomes of collaborative learning of clinical skills are superior or equivalent to those attained through individual learning.
According to a social interaction perspective, collaborative learning of clinical skills mediates its effects through social interaction, motivation, accountability and positive interdependence between learners. Motor skills learning theory suggests that positive effects rely on observational learning and action imitation, and negative effects may include decreased hands-on experience. Finally, a cognitive perspective suggests that learning is dependent on cognitive co-construction, shared knowledge and reduced cognitive load.
The literature on the collaborative learning of clinical skills in health science education is reviewed to support or contradict the hypotheses provided by the theories outlined above. Collaborative learning of clinical skills leads to improvements in self-efficacy, confidence and performance when task processing is observable or communicable. However, the effects of collaborative learning of clinical skills may decrease over time as benefits in terms of shared cognition, scaffolding and cognitive co-construction are outweighed by reductions in hands-on experience and time on task.
Collaborative learning of clinical skills has demonstrated promising results in the simulated setting. However, further research into how collaborative learning of clinical skills may work in clinical settings, as well as into the role of social dynamics between learners, is required.
本研究旨在概述为何、如何、何时以及针对哪些人群,协作学习临床技能可能在健康专业教育中发挥作用。
根据非医学文献,协作学习临床技能可能对学习产生积极影响。因此,如果协作学习临床技能的结果优于或等同于个体学习的结果,那么培训效率可能会提高。
根据社会互动的观点,协作学习临床技能通过学习者之间的社会互动、动机、责任和积极的相互依存关系来发挥其作用。运动技能学习理论表明,积极的影响依赖于观察学习和动作模仿,而消极的影响可能包括减少实践经验。最后,认知观点表明,学习取决于认知共同构建、共享知识和减少认知负荷。
回顾了健康科学教育中协作学习临床技能的文献,以支持或反驳上述理论提供的假设。当任务处理具有可观察性或可传达性时,协作学习临床技能会提高自我效能感、信心和表现。然而,随着共享认知、支架和认知共同构建带来的益处超过实践经验和任务时间的减少,协作学习临床技能的效果可能会随着时间的推移而降低。
协作学习临床技能在模拟环境中已显示出有希望的结果。然而,需要进一步研究协作学习临床技能如何在临床环境中发挥作用,以及学习者之间的社会动态的作用。