Chambers S E, Hoskins P R, Haddad N G, Johnstone F D, McDicken W N, Muir B B
Department of Obstetric Ultrasound, Simpson Memorial Maternity Pavilion, Edinburgh.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Jul;96(7):803-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03319.x.
A total of 145 pregnancies clinically suspected of being small-for-dates was studied at presentation with a single measurement of the fetal abdominal circumference and Doppler studies of the umbilical and arcuate arteries. The abdominal circumference measurement gave the best prediction of the small-for-gestational-age (SGA) baby (sensitivity 73%, umbilical artery sensitivity 47%, arcuate artery sensitivity 29%). The umbilical artery measurement gave the best prediction of antenatal fetal compromise; the performance of the tests was compared for a fixed sensitivity of 100% (i.e. all cases of antenatal compromise would be detected), the specificity of the umbilical artery measurement was 77%, abdominal circumference measurement 12% and arcuate artery measurement 2%. In our data, umbilical artery studies were not a sensitive predictor of the SGA baby but they did give an accurate prediction of the potentially compromised SGA fetus.
对总共145例临床怀疑为小于孕周的妊娠进行了研究,在就诊时测量了胎儿腹围,并对脐动脉和弓状动脉进行了多普勒研究。腹围测量对小于胎龄(SGA)婴儿的预测最佳(敏感性73%,脐动脉敏感性47%,弓状动脉敏感性29%)。脐动脉测量对产前胎儿窘迫的预测最佳;在固定敏感性为100%(即所有产前窘迫病例都能被检测到)的情况下,比较了各项检查的性能,脐动脉测量的特异性为77%,腹围测量为12%,弓状动脉测量为2%。在我们的数据中,脐动脉研究对SGA婴儿不是一个敏感的预测指标,但它们确实能准确预测潜在受损的SGA胎儿。