Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Department of Health Sciences Applied to the Locomotor Apparatus, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
J Physiother. 2016 Jan;62(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
In the active phase of the first stage of labour, does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) relieve pain or change its location? Does TENS delay the request for neuraxial analgesia during labour? Does TENS produce any harmful effects in the mother or the foetus? Are women in labour satisfied with the care provided?
Randomised trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding for some outcomes, and intention-to-treat analysis.
Forty-six low-risk, primigravida parturients with a gestational age > 37 weeks, cervical dilation of 4cm, and without the use of any medications from hospital admission until randomisation.
The principal investigator applied TENS to the experimental group for 30minutes starting at the beginning of the active phase of labour. A second investigator assessed the outcomes in both the control and experimental groups. Both groups received routine perinatal care.
The primary outcome was pain severity after the intervention period, which was assessed using the 100-mm visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes included: pain location, duration of the active phase of labour, time to pharmacological labour analgesia, mode of birth, neonatal outcomes, and the participant's satisfaction with the care provided.
After the intervention, a significant mean difference in change in pain of 15mm was observed favouring the experimental group (95% CI 2 to 27). The application of TENS did not alter the location or distribution of the pain. The mean time to pharmacological analgesia after the intervention was 5.0hours (95% CI 4.1 to 5.9) longer in the experimental group. The intervention did not significantly impact the other maternal and neonatal outcomes. Participants in both groups were satisfied with the care provided during labour.
TENS produces a significant decrease in pain during labour and postpones the need for pharmacological analgesia for pain relief.
NCT01600495.
在第一产程活跃期,经皮神经电刺激(TENS)能否缓解疼痛或改变疼痛位置?TENS 是否会延迟产妇分娩时对椎管内镇痛的需求?TENS 是否会对母亲或胎儿产生任何有害影响?分娩中的女性对所提供的护理是否满意?
随机试验,分配隐藏,部分结局评估设盲,意向治疗分析。
46 名低风险初产妇,孕周>37 周,宫颈扩张 4cm,从入院至随机分组前未使用任何药物。
主要研究者在第一产程活跃期开始时为实验组应用 TENS 30 分钟。第二研究者评估对照组和实验组的结局。两组均接受常规围产护理。
主要结局为干预后疼痛严重程度,采用 100mm 视觉模拟评分法评估。次要结局包括:疼痛位置、第一产程活跃期持续时间、药物性分娩镇痛时间、分娩方式、新生儿结局以及产妇对所提供护理的满意度。
干预后,实验组疼痛变化的平均差值有显著意义,为 15mm(95%CI:2 至 27),表明 TENS 组更优。TENS 应用并未改变疼痛的位置或分布。干预后实验组药物性镇痛时间平均延长 5.0 小时(95%CI:4.1 至 5.9)。干预对其他母婴结局无显著影响。两组参与者均对分娩期间的护理满意。
TENS 可显著减轻分娩疼痛,并延迟缓解疼痛所需的药物性镇痛。
NCT01600495。