Delgado Alexandre, Lemos Andrea, Marinho Geyson, Melo Renato S, Pinheiro Filipe, Amorim Melania
Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 Mar-Apr;29(2):101169. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101169. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
Physical therapy assistance during labor may provide physical and emotional support to the expectant mother. Through specific techniques, physical therapists may help alleviate pain, improve mobility, and facilitate a safer and more comfortable delivery.
To perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the potential benefits and risks of physical therapy assistance during labor.
A search was conducted in the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, PEDro, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases, with no restrictions on dates or language. The terms "Physical therapy assistance" and "Labor" were used. Randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials comparing a group receiving physical therapy assistance during labor with a control group receiving standard care were included. The Cochrane tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the Risk of Bias, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Quantitative analysis was performed through meta-analyses.
Twelve studies involving 984 pregnant women were included. There was an increase frequency of vaginal deliveries (RR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.17; 9 studies; I, 2%; T, 0.00; p = 0.42) and a reduction in cesarean sections (RR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.35, 0.76; 9 studies; I, 0%; T, 0.00; p = 0.65) for the physical therapy group, findings based on high-certainty evidence. There was also a reduction in the duration of the first stage of labor (MD: -99.01 min, 95% CI -153.35, -44.66; 7 studies; I, 88%; T, 4546.40; p = 0.00001), duration of the second stage (MD: - 11.29 min, 95% CI -18.94, -3.64; 6 studies; I, 53%; T, 45.01; p = 0.06) and frequence of perineal lacerations (RR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.25, 0.96; 4 studies; I, 0%; T, 0.00; p = 0.70) for the intervention group, findings based on moderate-certainty evidence. There was also a reduction in pain by 1.46 points on the Visual Analog Scale (MD: -1.46, 95% CI -2.52, -0.41; 7 studies; I, 100%; T, 1.90; p < 0.00001), findings based on low-certainty evidence, a decrease in analgesic use (RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.83, 0.99; 2 studies; I, 0%; T, 0.00; p = 0.44), and maternal anxiety by 7.65 points on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (MD: -7.65, 95% CI -11.27, -4.03; 2 studies; I, 88%; T, 5.99; p = 0.005) for the intervention group. There was no difference in the other maternal and fetal outcomes.
Physical therapy assistance during labor provides a number of benefits to the mother.
分娩期间的物理治疗协助可为准妈妈提供身体和情感支持。通过特定技术,物理治疗师可帮助减轻疼痛、改善活动能力,并促进更安全、更舒适的分娩。
对文献进行系统综述,以评估分娩期间物理治疗协助的潜在益处和风险。
在MEDLINE/PubMed、LILACS、PEDro、EMBASE、CINAHL、CENTRAL、科学网和SCOPUS数据库中进行检索,对日期和语言无限制。使用了“物理治疗协助”和“分娩”等术语。纳入了比较分娩期间接受物理治疗协助的组与接受标准护理的对照组的随机和半随机临床试验。使用Cochrane工具(RoB 2.0)评估偏倚风险,并使用GRADE系统评估证据的确定性。通过荟萃分析进行定量分析。
纳入了12项涉及984名孕妇的研究。物理治疗组的阴道分娩频率增加(RR:1.10,95%CI 1.04,1.17;9项研究;I²,2%;Tau²,0.00;p = 0.42),剖宫产率降低(RR:0.52,95%CI 0.35,0.76;9项研究;I²,0%;Tau²,0.00;p = 0.65),这些结果基于高确定性证据。干预组的第一产程持续时间也缩短(MD:-99.01分钟,95%CI -153.35,-44.66;7项研究;I²,88%;Tau²,4546.40;p = 0.00001),第二产程持续时间缩短(MD:-11.29分钟,95%CI -18.94,-3.64;6项研究;I²,53%;Tau²,45.01;p = 0.06),会阴裂伤频率降低(RR:0.49,95%CI 0.25,0.96;4项研究;I²,0%;Tau²,0.00;p = 0.70),这些结果基于中等确定性证据。干预组的视觉模拟评分疼痛也降低了1.46分(MD:-1.46,95%CI -2.52,-0.41;7项研究;I²,100%;Tau²,1.90;p < 0.00001),这一结果基于低确定性证据,镇痛药物使用减少(RR:0.90,95%CI 0.83,0.99;2项研究;I²,0%;Tau²,0.00;p = 0.44),状态-特质焦虑量表上的产妇焦虑降低7.65分(MD:-7.65,95%CI -11.27,-4.03;2项研究;I²,88%;Tau²,5.99;p = 0.005)。其他产妇和胎儿结局无差异。
分娩期间的物理治疗协助对母亲有诸多益处。