Reeve Jenny, Warman Sheena, Lewis Daniel, Watson Natalie, Papasouliotis Kostas
1 School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford, UK.
2 Small Animal Hospital, Langford Veterinary Services, Langford, UK.
J Feline Med Surg. 2017 Feb;19(2):207-215. doi: 10.1177/1098612X15622676. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
Objectives The aim of the study was to evaluate whether a handheld creatinine analyser (StatSensor Xpress; SSXp), available for human patients, can be used to measure creatinine reliably in cats. Methods Analytical performance was evaluated by determining within- and between-run coefficient of variation (CV, %), total error observed (TE, %) and sigma metrics. Fifty client-owned cats presenting for investigation of clinical disease had creatinine measured simultaneously, using SSXp (whole blood and plasma) and a reference instrument (Konelab, serum); 48 paired samples were included in the study. Creatinine correlation between methodologies (SSXp vs Konelab) and sample types (SSXp vs SSXp) was assessed by Spearman's correlation coefficient and agreement was determined using Bland-Altman difference plots. Each creatinine value was assigned an IRIS stage (1-4); correlation and agreement between Konelab and SSXp IRIS stages were evaluated. Results Within-run CV (4.23-8.85%), between-run CV (8.95-11.72%), TE (22.15-34.92%) and sigma metrics (⩽3) did not meet desired analytical requirements. Correlation between sample types was high (SSXp vs SSXp; r = 0.89), and between instruments was high (SSXp vs Konelab; r = 0.85) to very high (SSXp vs Konelab; r = 0.91). Konelab and SSXp IRIS scores exhibited high correlation ( r = 0.76). Packed cell volume did not significantly affect SSXp determination of creatinine. Bland-Altman difference plots identified a positive bias for the SSXp (7.13 μmol/l SSXp; 20.23 μmol/l SSXp) compared with the Konelab. Outliers (1/48 whole blood; 2/48 plasma) occurred exclusively at very high creatinine concentrations. The SSXp failed to identify 2/21 azotaemic cats. Conclusions and relevance Analytical performance of the SSXp in feline patients is not considered acceptable. The SSXp exhibited a high to very high correlation compared with the reference methodology but the two instruments cannot be used interchangeably. Improvements in the SSXp analytical performance are needed before its use can be recommended in feline clinical practice.
目的 本研究旨在评估一种可供人类患者使用的手持式肌酐分析仪(StatSensor Xpress;SSXp)是否可用于可靠地测量猫的肌酐。方法 通过测定批内和批间变异系数(CV,%)、观察到的总误差(TE,%)和西格玛指标来评估分析性能。五十只因临床疾病前来检查的客户拥有的猫,同时使用SSXp(全血和血浆)和参考仪器(Konelab,血清)测量肌酐;48对样本纳入研究。通过Spearman相关系数评估方法(SSXp与Konelab)和样本类型(SSXp与SSXp)之间的肌酐相关性,并使用Bland-Altman差异图确定一致性。每个肌酐值被指定一个IRIS阶段(1-4);评估Konelab和SSXp的IRIS阶段之间的相关性和一致性。结果 批内CV(4.23-8.85%)、批间CV(8.95-11.72%)、TE(22.15-34.92%)和西格玛指标(⩽3)未达到所需的分析要求。样本类型之间的相关性较高(SSXp与SSXp;r = 0.89),仪器之间的相关性较高(SSXp与Konelab;r = 0.85)至极高(SSXp与Konelab;r = 0.91)。Konelab和SSXp的IRIS评分表现出高度相关性(r = 0.76)。红细胞压积对SSXp测定肌酐没有显著影响。Bland-Altman差异图显示,与Konelab相比,SSXp存在正偏差(全血7.13 μmol/l SSXp;血浆20.23 μmol/l SSXp)。异常值(全血1/48;血浆2/48)仅出现在肌酐浓度非常高时。SSXp未能识别21只氮血症猫中的2只。结论及相关性 SSXp在猫科动物患者中的分析性能不被认为是可接受的。与参考方法相比,SSXp表现出高至极高的相关性,但这两种仪器不能互换使用。在猫科动物临床实践中推荐使用之前,需要改进SSXp的分析性能。