Mendez Mario F, Ringman John M, Shapira Jill S
*Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, The University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California †Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Center, Los Angeles, California.
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2015 Dec;28(4):188-97. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000077.
Developmental prosopagnosia (DP) and semantic dementia (SD) may be the two most common neurologic disorders of face processing, but their main clinical and pathophysiologic differences have not been established. To identify those features, we compared patients with DP and SD.
Five patients with DP, five with right temporal-predominant SD, and ten normal controls underwent cognitive, visual perceptual, and face-processing tasks.
Although the patients with SD were more cognitively impaired than those with DP, the two groups did not differ statistically on the visual perceptual tests. On the face-processing tasks, the DP group had difficulty with configural analysis and they reported relying on serial, feature-by-feature analysis or awareness of salient features to recognize faces. By contrast, the SD group had problems with person knowledge and made semantically related errors. The SD group had better face familiarity scores, suggesting a potentially useful clinical test for distinguishing SD from DP.
These two disorders of face processing represent clinically distinguishable disturbances along a right hemisphere face-processing network: DP, characterized by early configural agnosia for faces, and SD, characterized primarily by a multimodal person knowledge disorder. We discuss these preliminary findings in the context of the current literature on the face-processing network; recent studies suggest an additional right anterior temporal, unimodal face familiarity-memory deficit consistent with an "associative prosopagnosia."
发育性面孔失认症(DP)和语义性痴呆(SD)可能是面部加工最常见的两种神经障碍,但它们主要的临床和病理生理差异尚未明确。为了确定这些特征,我们对DP和SD患者进行了比较。
5例DP患者、5例以右侧颞叶为主的SD患者和10名正常对照者接受了认知、视觉感知和面部加工任务。
虽然SD患者比DP患者有更严重的认知障碍,但两组在视觉感知测试中无统计学差异。在面部加工任务中,DP组在构型分析方面存在困难,他们报告依靠逐个特征的串行分析或对显著特征的认知来识别面孔。相比之下,SD组在人物知识方面存在问题,并出现语义相关错误。SD组的面孔熟悉度得分更高,这表明这是一种区分SD和DP的潜在有用的临床测试。
这两种面部加工障碍代表了沿右侧半球面部加工网络临床上可区分的障碍:DP的特征是早期对面孔的构型失认,而SD主要特征是多模式人物知识障碍。我们在当前关于面部加工网络的文献背景下讨论这些初步发现;最近的研究表明,右侧前颞叶存在额外的单模式面孔熟悉度-记忆缺陷,这与“联想性面孔失认症”一致。