Klein D F, Klein H M
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicans and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1989;238(5-6):268-79. doi: 10.1007/BF00449808.
In this paper we discuss the theory that agoraphobic avoidances are central and spontaneous panics an epiphenomenon to the development of agoraphobia. Moreover we discuss the theory that posits a fixed cognitive-catastrophizing set as causal for panic. We conclude these theories do not fit the facts. We argue that it is important to distinguish between spontaneous panic and chronic or anticipatory anxiety and avoidance. Such a distinction allows for an understanding of the roles of anti-spontaneous panic medications such as tricyclics and MAOI's as well as exposure therapy, in the treatment of panic disorder with agoraphobia. The former serves the purpose of blocking panic attacks while the latter undermines phobic avoidance, but only after the panic attacks have ceased through proper medication. We conclude that recognizing the key role of spontaneous panic and its variants in anxiety nosology is a necessary guide for etiological, psychophysiological and therapeutic research in this rapidly developing area.
在本文中,我们讨论了广场恐惧症回避行为是核心,而自发性惊恐是广场恐惧症发展的一种附带现象的理论。此外,我们还讨论了将固定的认知灾难化模式假定为惊恐发作原因的理论。我们得出结论,这些理论并不符合事实。我们认为,区分自发性惊恐与慢性或预期性焦虑及回避行为很重要。这种区分有助于理解三环类药物和单胺氧化酶抑制剂等抗自发性惊恐药物以及暴露疗法在治疗伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍中的作用。前者旨在阻止惊恐发作,而后者则是在通过适当药物治疗使惊恐发作停止后,削弱恐惧回避行为。我们得出结论,认识到自发性惊恐及其变体在焦虑症分类学中的关键作用,是这一快速发展领域病因学、心理生理学和治疗研究的必要指南。