• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项来自瑞典两家大学医院的队列研究中,院内心脏骤停后的生存率与年龄合并Charlson共病指数高度相关。

Survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest is highly associated with the Age-combined Charlson Co-morbidity Index in a cohort study from a two-site Swedish University hospital.

作者信息

Piscator Eva, Hedberg Pontus, Göransson Katarina, Djärv Therese

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2016 Feb;99:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.11.023. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.11.023
PMID:26708451
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) has a poor prognosis and clinicians often write "Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation" (DNAR) orders based on co-morbidities.

AIM

To assess the impact of the Age-combined Charlson Co-morbidity Index (ACCI) on 30-days survival after IHCA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients suffering IHCA at Karolinska University Hospital between 1st January and 31st December 2014 were included. Data regarding patient characteristics, co-morbidities and survival were drawn from the electronic patient records. Co-morbidities were assessed prior to the IHCA as ICD-10 codes according to the ACCI. Differences in survival were assessed with adjusted logistic regression models and presented as Odds Ratios with 95% Confidence Intervals (OR, 95% CI) between patients with an ACCI of 0-4 points versus those with 5-7 points, as well as those with ≥8 points. Adjustments included hospital site, heart rhythm, ECG surveillance, witnessed status and place of IHCA.

RESULTS

In all, 174 patients suffered IHCA, of whom 41 (24%) survived at least 30 days. Patients with an ACCI of 5-7 points had a minor chance and those with an ACCI of ≥8 points had a minimal chance of surviving IHCA compared to those with an ACCI of 0-4 points (adjusted OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.26 and OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.03-0.42, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a moderate or severe burden of ACCI have a minor chance of surviving an IHCA. This information could be used as part of the decision tools during ongoing CPR, and could be an aid for clinicians in planning care and discussing DNAR orders.

摘要

背景

院内心脏骤停(IHCA)预后较差,临床医生常根据合并症开具“不要尝试心肺复苏”(DNAR)医嘱。

目的

评估年龄合并查尔森合并症指数(ACCI)对院内心脏骤停后30天生存率的影响。

材料与方法

纳入2014年1月1日至12月31日在卡罗林斯卡大学医院发生院内心脏骤停的所有患者。患者特征、合并症和生存数据来自电子病历。根据ACCI,在院内心脏骤停前将合并症评估为国际疾病分类第10版(ICD - 10)编码。使用调整后的逻辑回归模型评估生存率差异,并以0 - 4分、5 - 7分以及≥8分的ACCI患者之间的比值比和95%置信区间(OR,95%CI)表示。调整因素包括医院地点、心律、心电图监测、是否被目击及院内心脏骤停发生地点。

结果

共有174例患者发生院内心脏骤停,其中41例(24%)存活至少30天。与ACCI为0 - 4分的患者相比,ACCI为5 - 7分的患者存活机会较小,而ACCI≥8分的患者院内心脏骤停存活机会极小(调整后的OR分别为0.10,95%CI 0.04 - 0.26和OR 0.04,95%CI 0.03 - 0.42)。

结论

ACCI负担为中度或重度的患者院内心脏骤停存活机会较小。该信息可作为正在进行的心肺复苏期间决策工具的一部分,有助于临床医生规划护理和讨论DNAR医嘱。

相似文献

1
Survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest is highly associated with the Age-combined Charlson Co-morbidity Index in a cohort study from a two-site Swedish University hospital.在一项来自瑞典两家大学医院的队列研究中,院内心脏骤停后的生存率与年龄合并Charlson共病指数高度相关。
Resuscitation. 2016 Feb;99:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.11.023. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
2
Trends in co-morbidities and survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest -A Swedish cohort study.住院心脏骤停患者合并症及生存趋势——一项瑞典队列研究。
Resuscitation. 2018 Mar;124:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.12.025. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
3
Preceding national early warnings scores among in-hospital cardiac arrests and their impact on survival.住院心脏骤停前的全国早期预警评分及其对生存的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;35(11):1601-1606. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.04.072. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
4
Long-term mortality and morbidity among 30-day survivors after in-hospital cardiac arrests - a Swedish cohort study.住院心脏骤停后 30 天存活者的长期死亡率和发病率 - 一项瑞典队列研究。
Resuscitation. 2018 Mar;124:76-79. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
Survival of in-hospital cardiac arrest in men and women in a large Swedish cohort.在大型瑞典队列中男性和女性院内心脏骤停的存活率。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Dec 19;26(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0576-0.
6
Duration of CPR and impact on 30-day survival after ROSC for in-hospital cardiac arrest-A Swedish cohort study.心肺复苏持续时间对院内心脏骤停后自主循环恢复 30 天生存率的影响:一项瑞典队列研究。
Resuscitation. 2018 Nov;132:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
7
Corrigendum to "Long-term mortality and morbidity among 30-day survivors after in-hospital cardiac arrests-A Swedish cohort study" [Resuscitation 124 (2018) 76-79].《住院心脏骤停后30天幸存者的长期死亡率和发病率——一项瑞典队列研究》的勘误[《复苏》124(2018)76 - 79]
Resuscitation. 2018 Apr;125:144-148. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.01.032.
8
Implications of a recurrent in-hospital cardiac arrest on survival and neurological outcomes.再次发生院内心搏骤停对生存和神经结局的影响。
Am Heart J. 2018 Aug;202:139-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 May 9.
9
Long-term survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest: A matched cohort study.院内心脏骤停后的长期生存:一项配对队列研究。
Resuscitation. 2016 Feb;99:72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
10
Evaluation of pre-arrest morbidity score and prognosis after resuscitation score and other clinical variables associated with in-hospital cardiac arrest in southern Sweden.瑞典南部院内心脏骤停患者的心脏骤停前发病评分、复苏后预后评分及其他临床变量的评估
Resuscitation. 2014 Oct;85(10):1370-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Using an audiovisual feedback device improves cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during day and night - a randomized controlled simulation study.使用视听反馈设备可改善昼夜心肺复苏操作表现——一项随机对照模拟研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 7;25(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01249-1.
2
[Quality of life after in-hospital cardiac arrest : An 11-year experience from an university center].[院内心脏骤停后的生活质量:一所大学中心的11年经验]
Anaesthesiologie. 2024 Jul;73(7):454-461. doi: 10.1007/s00101-024-01423-3. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
Older adults' medical preferences for the end of life: a cross-sectional population-based survey in Switzerland.
瑞士一项基于人口的横断面调查:老年人对生命终末期的医疗偏好。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 24;13(7):e071444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071444.
4
Anemia before in-hospital cardiac arrest and survival from cardio-pulmonary resuscitation-a retrospective cohort study.住院期间心脏骤停前的贫血与心肺复苏后的生存情况——一项回顾性队列研究
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2022 Dec 20;2(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s44158-022-00080-5.
5
Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index as effective predictor for in-hospital mortality of patients with cardiac arrest: a retrospective study.年龄调整 Charlson 共病指数是预测心脏骤停患者住院死亡率的有效指标:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 26;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00769-4.
6
Frailty, multimorbidity and in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: predictable markers of outcome?虚弱、多种合并症和院内心肺复苏:可预测的结局标志物?
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Jul;21(4):e357-e362. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-1002.
7
Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and 5-Year Survival Following in-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.院内心脏骤停后心肺复苏质量与5年生存率
Open Access Emerg Med. 2021 Dec 16;13:553-560. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S341479. eCollection 2021.
8
Cardiac Arrest Survival Postresuscitation In-Hospital (CASPRI) Score Predicts Neurological Favorable Survival in Emergency Department Cardiac Arrest.心脏骤停复苏后院内生存(CASPRI)评分可预测急诊科心脏骤停患者神经功能良好生存情况。
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 31;10(21):5131. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215131.
9
In-hospital cardiac arrest due to pulmonary embolism - Treatment and outcomes in a Swedish cohort study.肺栓塞所致院内心脏骤停——瑞典队列研究中的治疗与结局
Resusc Plus. 2021 Nov 1;8:100178. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100178. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
Pre-arrest and intra-arrest prognostic factors associated with survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis.与院内心脏骤停后存活相关的术前和术中心脏骤停预后因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Dec 4;367:l6373. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6373.