Suppr超能文献

再次发生院内心搏骤停对生存和神经结局的影响。

Implications of a recurrent in-hospital cardiac arrest on survival and neurological outcomes.

机构信息

Pembroke Hill High School, Kansas City, MO.

Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO; University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2018 Aug;202:139-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 May 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the high incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in US hospitals, the prognosis and end-of-life decision-making patterns of a patient with a recurrent IHCA are unknown.

METHODS

Within Get-With-The-Guidelines-Resuscitation, we identified 192,250 patients from 711 hospitals with an IHCA from 2000 to 2015. Patients were categorized as having no recurrent IHCA (only 1 event), recurrent IHCA (≥2 IHCAs), and recurrent out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), defined as an IHCA after an OHCA. Using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression, rates of survival to discharge and favorable neurological survival (mild or no disability) between the 3 groups were compared. Rates of de novo "do not attempt resuscitation" (DNAR) and withdrawal of care orders among successfully resuscitated patients were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 165,446 (86.1%) had no recurrent IHCA, 23,643 (12.3%) had recurrent IHCA, and 3162 (1.6%) had recurrent OHCA. Compared with patients with no recurrent IHCA, patients with recurrent IHCA were less than half as likely to survive to discharge (12.7% vs 22.1%; adjusted OR: 0.46 [0.44-0.48], P < .001) and have favorable neurological survival (7.0% vs 13.1%; adjusted OR: 0.44 [0.42-0.47], P < .001). Compared with patients with recurrent OHCA, patients with recurrent IHCA also had lower rates of survival to discharge (12.7% vs 16.1%; adjusted OR: 0.81 [0.71-0.94], P = .005) and favorable neurological survival (7.0% vs 8.9%; adjusted OR: 0.66 [0.54-0.81], P < .001). Despite worse survival outcomes, patients with recurrent IHCA were least likely to adopt DNAR orders within the first 24 hours after successful resuscitation compared with patients with no recurrent IHCA or recurrent OHCA (17.2% vs 18.9% and 26.6%, respectively) or withdraw care at any time (17.7% vs 24.4% and 31.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 1 in 8 patients with an IHCA has a recurrent IHCA, and these patients have worse outcomes than patients with only a single IHCA and those with an IHCA after being hospitalized for an OHCA. Despite worse survival, rates of DNAR and withdrawal of care were lowest for patients with recurrent IHCA. These findings provide important prognostic information for clinicians caring for patients with recurrent IHCA and suggest the need to better align resuscitation and end-of-life decisions with patients' prognoses after IHCA.

摘要

背景

尽管美国医院中心脏骤停(IHCA)的发生率很高,但患有复发性 IHCA 的患者的预后和临终决策模式尚不清楚。

方法

在 Get-With-The-Guidelines-Resuscitation 中,我们从 2000 年至 2015 年期间,从 711 家医院中确定了 192250 名 IHCA 患者。将患者分为无复发性 IHCA(仅 1 次事件)、复发性 IHCA(≥2 次 IHCA)和复发性院外心脏骤停(OHCA),定义为 OHCA 后发生的 IHCA。使用多变量分层逻辑回归,比较了 3 组患者出院时的生存率和良好的神经生存(轻度或无残疾)。还评估了成功复苏患者中新生“不尝试复苏”(DNAR)和停止治疗的比例。

结果

总体而言,165446 名(86.1%)患者无复发性 IHCA,23643 名(12.3%)患者有复发性 IHCA,3162 名(1.6%)患者有复发性 OHCA。与无复发性 IHCA 的患者相比,复发性 IHCA 的患者出院生存率降低了近一半(12.7%比 22.1%;调整后的 OR:0.46 [0.44-0.48],< 0.001),神经功能良好的生存率也降低了(7.0%比 13.1%;调整后的 OR:0.44 [0.42-0.47],< 0.001)。与复发性 OHCA 的患者相比,复发性 IHCA 的患者出院生存率也较低(12.7%比 16.1%;调整后的 OR:0.81 [0.71-0.94],P = 0.005)和良好的神经生存(7.0%比 8.9%;调整后的 OR:0.66 [0.54-0.81],< 0.001)。尽管生存结局较差,但与无复发性 IHCA 或复发性 OHCA 的患者相比,复发性 IHCA 的患者在成功复苏后 24 小时内最不可能下达 DNAR 医嘱(分别为 17.2%比 18.9%和 26.6%)或随时停止治疗(分别为 17.7%比 24.4%和 31.2%)。

结论

近 1/8 的 IHCA 患者有复发性 IHCA,这些患者的预后比仅有 1 次 IHCA 的患者和因 OHCA 住院后发生 IHCA 的患者更差。尽管生存率较低,但复发性 IHCA 患者的 DNAR 和停止治疗的比例最低。这些发现为护理复发性 IHCA 患者的临床医生提供了重要的预后信息,并表明需要根据患者 IHCA 后的预后更好地调整复苏和临终决策。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest.院内心脏骤停后生存率的变化趋势。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 15;367(20):1912-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109148.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验