Duarte-Rojo A, Fischer S E, Adeyi O, Zita D, Deneke M G, Selzner N, Chen L, Malespin M, Cotler S J, McGilvray I D, Feld J J
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Department of Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Viral Hepat. 2016 May;23(5):340-7. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12494. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
The outcome of triple therapy with protease inhibitors (PI) depends on the intrinsic response to interferon. Interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression differs by cell type in the liver and is a strong predictor of interferon responsiveness. Patients who respond well to interferon have low/absent ISG expression in hepatocytes but significant ISG expression in macrophages. Nonresponders (NRs) show the opposite pattern. We aimed to determine the association between cell-type-specific ISG staining and treatment outcome with PI-based triple therapy. Liver biopsy tissue from consecutive patients treated with boceprevir or telaprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin was stained for myxovirus A (MxA). Staining was scored 0-3 in macrophages (M-MxA) and hepatocytes (H-MxA), and IL28B genotyping was performed. Of 56 patients included 41 achieved SVR (73%) (sustained virological response), 2 (4%) relapsed, 10 (18%) were NRs, and 3 (5%) were lost to follow-up. Median M-MxA staining was stronger and H-MxA staining was weaker in patients who achieved SVR. MxA staining correlated with IL28B genotype and with the HCV RNA decline during lead-in phase. However, unlike with dual therapy, the negative predictive value (NPV) of absent or weak M-MxA staining was poor (42%), while the positive predictive value improved (93%). Although by multivariable logistic regression M-MxA staining was significantly associated with SVR (OR 4.35, 1.32-14.28, P = 0.012), the predictive ability was inadequate to withhold therapy. The interaction between macrophages and hepatocytes plays a critical role in interferon responsiveness; however, the addition of a PI at least partially overcomes the interferon nonresponse phenotype making the predictive ability of ISG staining less clinically useful.
蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)三联疗法的疗效取决于对干扰素的内在反应。干扰素刺激基因(ISG)的表达在肝脏中因细胞类型而异,并且是干扰素反应性的强预测指标。对干扰素反应良好的患者在肝细胞中ISG表达低/无,但在巨噬细胞中有显著的ISG表达。无反应者(NRs)则表现出相反的模式。我们旨在确定基于PI的三联疗法中细胞类型特异性ISG染色与治疗结果之间的关联。对接受博赛匹韦或特拉匹韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林治疗的连续患者的肝活检组织进行黏液病毒A(MxA)染色。在巨噬细胞(M-MxA)和肝细胞(H-MxA)中对染色进行0-3评分,并进行IL28B基因分型。纳入的56例患者中,41例实现了持续病毒学应答(SVR)(73%),2例(4%)复发,10例(18%)为无反应者,3例(5%)失访。实现SVR的患者中,M-MxA染色的中位数更强,H-MxA染色的中位数更弱。MxA染色与IL28B基因型以及导入期丙型肝炎病毒RNA下降相关。然而,与双联疗法不同,M-MxA染色缺失或较弱的阴性预测值(NPV)较差(42%),而阳性预测值有所提高(93%)。尽管通过多变量逻辑回归分析,M-MxA染色与SVR显著相关(比值比4.35,1.32-14.28,P = 0.012),但其预测能力不足以停止治疗。巨噬细胞与肝细胞之间的相互作用在干扰素反应性中起关键作用;然而,添加PI至少部分克服了干扰素无反应表型,使得ISG染色的预测能力在临床上不太有用。