Nishimura Goshi, Yabuki Kenichiro, Hata Masaharu, Komatsu Masanori, Taguchi Takahide, Takahashi Masahiro, Shiono Osamu, Sano Daisuke, Arai Yasuhiro, Takahashi Hideaki, Chiba Yoshihiro, Oridate Nobuhiko
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Department of Radiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;21(4):658-667. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0936-y. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is used to treat lymph node metastatic head and neck cancer patients. Regional control of the neck disease is important to improve the prognosis, and the accuracy of the method used to evaluate the metastatic lymph node(s) after CRT is crucial to the decision-making process for any following salvage surgery.
Patients undergoing CRT were divided in two groups of patients of those showing complete clinical response (CR) and those showing clinical non-response (non-CR), as assessed by computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasonography, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and fine needle aspiration cytology. The responses (CR vs. non-CR) were compared with the actual clinical outcomes. For the interim analysis, the study period was broken down into two periods, namely, the exploratory phase (patients treated between January 2002 and April 2012) and the validating phase (patients treated between May 2012 and January 2014).
The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were as follows: CT and/or MRI, 66.7, 73.8, and 72.8 %, respectively, in the exploratory phase; ultrasonography, 91.7, 70.6, and 73.4 %, respectively, in the exploratory phase and 80.0, 82.8, and 82.4 %, respectively, in the validating phase; FDG-PET, 50.0, 97.5, and 91.3 %, respectively, in the exploratory phase and 60.0, 100, and 94.1 %, respectively, in the validating phase; cytology, 68.4, 95.9, and 90.3 %, respectively, in the exploratory phase and 66.7, 100, and 85.7 %, respectively, in the validating phase.
Based on our results, CT and/or MRI appear to be inadequate methods for the evaluation of the response of lymph node(s) to CRT. In contrast, ultrasonography appears to be a highly sensitive and useful tool for positive screening at 6-8 weeks after CRT, and FDG-PET appears to be a highly specific and useful tool for negative screening at 8-12 weeks after CRT.
确定性放化疗(CRT)用于治疗淋巴结转移的头颈癌患者。颈部疾病的区域控制对于改善预后很重要,且CRT后用于评估转移性淋巴结的方法的准确性对于后续挽救性手术的决策过程至关重要。
接受CRT的患者根据计算机断层扫描(CT)和/或磁共振成像(MRI)、超声检查、氟脱氧葡萄糖-正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)及细针穿刺细胞学检查评估的结果,分为临床完全缓解(CR)组和临床未缓解(非CR)组。将这些反应(CR与非CR)与实际临床结果进行比较。对于中期分析,研究期分为两个阶段,即探索阶段(2002年1月至2012年4月接受治疗的患者)和验证阶段(2012年5月至2014年1月接受治疗的患者)。
敏感性、特异性和准确性如下:在探索阶段,CT和/或MRI的分别为66.7%、73.8%和72.8%;超声检查在探索阶段分别为91.7%、70.6%和73.4%,在验证阶段分别为80.0%、82.8%和82.4%;FDG-PET在探索阶段分别为50.0%、97.5%和91.3%,在验证阶段分别为60.0%、100%和94.1%;细胞学检查在探索阶段分别为68.4%、95.9%和90.3%,在验证阶段分别为66.7%、100%和85.7%。
根据我们的结果,CT和/或MRI似乎是评估淋巴结对CRT反应的不充分方法。相比之下,超声检查似乎是CRT后6-8周进行阳性筛查的高度敏感且有用的工具,而FDG-PET似乎是CRT后8-12周进行阴性筛查的高度特异且有用的工具。