The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, SM2 5NG, United Kingdom.
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Apr 23;64(9):095003. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab13f2.
Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) can be used to provide information about the vasculature aiding diagnosis and monitoring of a number of pathologies including cancer. In the development of a CEUS imaging system, there are many choices to be made, such as whether to use plane wave (PW) or focused imaging (FI), and the values for parameters such as transmit frequency, F-number, mechanical index, and number of compounding angles (for PW imaging). CEUS image contrast may also be dependent on subject characteristics, e.g. flow speed and vessel orientation. We evaluated the effect of such choices on vessel contrast for PW and FI in vitro, using 2D ultrasound imaging. CEUS images were obtained using a Vantage (Verasonics Inc.) and a pulse-inversion (PI) algorithm on a flow phantom. Contrast (C) and contrast reduction (CR) were calculated, where C was the initial ratio of signal in vessel to signal in background and CR was its reduction after 200 frames (acquired in 20 s). Two transducer orientations were used: parallel and perpendicular to the vessel direction. Similar C and CR was achievable for PW and FI by choosing optimal parameter values. PW imaging suffered from high frequency grating lobe artefacts, which may lead to degraded image quality and misinterpretation of data. Flow rate influenced the contrast based on: (1) false contrast increase due to the bubble motion between the PI positive and negative pulses (for both PW and FI), and (2) contrast reduction due to the incoherency caused by bubble motion between the compounding angles (for PW only). The effects were less pronounced for perpendicular transducer orientation compared to a parallel one. Although both effects are undesirable, it may be more straight forward to account for artefacts in FI as it only suffers from the former effect. In conclusion, if higher frame rate imaging is not required (a benefit of PW), FI appears to be a better choice of imaging mode for CEUS, providing greater image quality over PW for similar rates of contrast reduction.
对比增强超声(CEUS)和动态对比增强超声(DCE-US)可用于提供有关血管的信息,辅助多种病理学(包括癌症)的诊断和监测。在开发 CEUS 成像系统时,需要做出许多选择,例如是否使用平面波(PW)或聚焦成像(FI),以及诸如发射频率、F 数、机械指数和复合角度数(对于 PW 成像)等参数的值。CEUS 图像对比度也可能取决于受试者的特征,例如血流速度和血管方向。我们使用二维超声成像评估了这些选择对 PW 和 FI 体外血管对比度的影响。使用 Vantage(Verasonics Inc.)和脉冲反转(PI)算法在流动体模上获得 CEUS 图像。计算了对比(C)和对比降低(CR),其中 C 是血管信号与背景信号的初始比值,CR 是 200 帧(20 秒采集)后的降低值。使用了两种换能器方向:与血管方向平行和垂直。通过选择最佳参数值,PW 和 FI 可以实现相似的 C 和 CR。PW 成像受到高频栅格瓣伪影的影响,这可能导致图像质量下降和数据误判。血流速度会根据以下原因影响对比度:(1)由于 PI 正负脉冲之间的气泡运动导致的虚假对比度增加(对于 PW 和 FI 都是如此),以及(2)由于复合角度之间的气泡运动导致的对比度降低(仅对于 PW)。与平行方向相比,垂直换能器方向的影响较小。尽管这两种影响都不理想,但在 FI 中更容易考虑到伪影,因为它仅受到前一种影响的影响。总之,如果不需要更高的帧率成像(PW 的优势),FI 似乎是 CEUS 成像模式的更好选择,对于相似的对比度降低率,它提供比 PW 更好的图像质量。