Suppr超能文献

抗菌光动力疗法作为系统抗生素的替代疗法:来自 2 型糖尿病患者的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床研究结果。

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an alternative to systemic antibiotics: results from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical study on type 2 diabetics.

机构信息

Department of Bucco-Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Traumatology and Periodontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Feb;43(2):147-55. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12498. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

Abstract

AIM

This double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study compared multiple applications of the antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) treatment protocol, to systemic doxycycline as adjuvant to scaling and root planing (SRP) on type 2 diabetic patients on clinical, systemic and immune-inflammatory outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with Hba1c >7% were allocated in two groups, SRP + Doxy (n = 15) using systemic doxycycline 100 mg/day (14 days) and SRP + aPDT (n = 15) with multiple applications (0, 3, 7 and 14 days). Primary outcome was glycated haemoglobin levels (HbA1c). Clinical parameters: plaque score (PS), bleeding on probe, probing depth, suppuration, gingival recession, and clinical attachment level, percentage of pockets with desired clinical endpoint were measured at baseline and 3 months after therapy. Cytokine profile was assessed at 0, 1 and 3 month to measure IL1-β, TNF-α and TGF-β on gingival crevicular fluid.

RESULTS

No significant difference was detected on HbA1c, between treatments. The SRP + aPDT group showed advantage on reducing moderate pockets in single-rooted teeth at 3 months. SRP + aPDT presented better results at 3 months on IL1-β levels. There were no significant differences between TNF-α and TGF-β.

CONCLUSIONS

Both treatments improved clinical and systemic outcomes (Hba1c). SRP + aPDT performed better in moderate probing pocket depth on single-rooted teeth, reduced favourably inflammation in short term, and may be an alternative to systemic antibiotics. (Clinicaltrials.org ID NCT01595594).

摘要

目的

本双盲、安慰剂对照临床研究比较了多次应用抗菌光动力疗法(aPDT)治疗方案与系统应用强力霉素作为辅助治疗,对 2 型糖尿病患者的临床、系统和免疫炎症结果的影响。

材料和方法

30 名糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)>7%的患者被分为两组,SRP+强力霉素(n=15)组采用系统应用强力霉素 100mg/天(14 天),SRP+aPDT(n=15)组采用多次应用(0、3、7 和 14 天)。主要结局指标为糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平。临床参数:菌斑指数(PS)、探诊出血、探诊深度、溢脓、牙龈退缩和临床附着水平,在基线和治疗后 3 个月测量牙周袋的理想临床终点百分比。在 0、1 和 3 个月评估细胞因子谱,以测量龈沟液中的 IL1-β、TNF-α 和 TGF-β。

结果

两种治疗方法在 HbA1c 方面无显著差异。SRP+aPDT 组在 3 个月时减少单根牙中度牙周袋的效果更好。SRP+aPDT 在 3 个月时 IL1-β水平的结果更好。TNF-α和 TGF-β无显著差异。

结论

两种治疗方法均改善了临床和系统结局(HbA1c)。SRP+aPDT 在单根牙的中度探诊深度牙周袋方面表现更好,在短期内炎症减轻,可能是系统应用抗生素的替代方法。(Clinicaltrials.org 注册号 NCT01595594)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验