• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Educating Parents About Pediatric Research: Children and Clinical Studies Website Qualitative Evaluation.向家长宣传儿科研究:儿童与临床研究网站的定性评估
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jul;26(8):1114-22. doi: 10.1177/1049732315616620. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
2
Barriers to participation in surgical randomized controlled trials in pediatric urology: A qualitative study of key stakeholder perspectives.小儿泌尿外科手术随机对照试验参与障碍:关键利益相关者观点的定性研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Jun;12(3):180.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
3
Pediatric medication use experiences and patient counseling in community pharmacies: Perspectives of children and parents.社区药房中儿童用药经历及患者咨询:儿童与家长的观点
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Jan-Feb;57(1):38-46.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
4
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
6
A website to improve asthma care by suggesting patient questions for physicians: qualitative analysis of user experiences.一个通过为医生提供患者问题建议来改善哮喘护理的网站:用户体验的定性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Feb 7;9(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.1.e3.
7
Jointly managing arthritis: information needs of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and their parents.共同管理关节炎:青少年特发性关节炎(JIA)患儿及其父母的信息需求
J Child Health Care. 2012 Jun;16(2):124-40. doi: 10.1177/1367493511430679. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
8
E-health and health care behaviour of parents of young children: a qualitative study.幼儿家长的电子健康与医疗保健行为:一项定性研究
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Jun;34(2):135-42. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2016.1160627. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
9
Perceptions of Dental Hygienists and Dentists about Preventing Early Childhood Caries: A Qualitative Study.牙科保健员和牙医对预防幼儿龋齿的看法:一项定性研究。
J Dent Hyg. 2017 Aug;91(4):29-36.
10
Parents' views on childhood obesity: qualitative analysis of discussion board postings.父母对儿童肥胖的看法:对讨论板帖子的定性分析
Contemp Nurse. 2017 Aug;53(4):410-420. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2017.1358650. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Voice of Parents of Children With a Congenital Anomaly - A EUROlinkCAT Study.先天性异常儿童家长之声——一项EUROlinkCAT研究
Front Pediatr. 2021 Nov 29;9:654883. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.654883. eCollection 2021.
2
Understanding parents' decision-making on participation in clinical trials in children's heart surgery: a qualitative study.理解父母在儿童心脏手术临床试验中参与决策的情况:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 23;11(2):e044896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044896.
3
Keep Calm and Carry on: Parental Opinions on Improving Clinical Dietary Trials for Young Children.保持冷静并继续前行:改善幼儿临床饮食试验的家长意见。
Nutrients. 2018 Aug 25;10(9):1166. doi: 10.3390/nu10091166.

本文引用的文献

1
Parents' agendas in paediatric clinical trial recruitment are different from researchers' and often remain unvoiced: a qualitative study.家长在儿科临床试验招募中的意向与研究人员不同,且往往未被提及:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 3;8(7):e67352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067352. Print 2013.
2
Factors that influence parental decisions to participate in clinical research: consenters vs nonconsenters.影响父母参与临床研究决策的因素:同意者与不同意者。
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Jun;167(6):561-6. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1050.
3
Status of the pediatric clinical trials enterprise: an analysis of the US ClinicalTrials.gov registry.儿科临床试验现状:对美国 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册库的分析。
Pediatrics. 2012 Nov;130(5):e1269-77. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3565. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
4
An online resource of digital stories about cancer genetics: qualitative study of patient preferences and information needs.一个关于癌症遗传学的数字故事在线资源:患者偏好与信息需求的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 30;13(3):e78. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1735.
5
Adolescents' understanding of research concepts: a focus group study.青少年对研究概念的理解:一项焦点小组研究。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Jun;165(6):533-9. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.87.
6
Why do parents enroll their children in research: a narrative synthesis.为何家长让孩子参与研究:叙事综述。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Sep;37(9):544-51. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040220. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
7
Children and clinical studies: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's new multimedia resource for pediatric research.儿童与临床研究:美国国立心肺血液研究所的新型儿科研究多媒体资源
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 4;54(6):502-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.041.
8
Racial/ethnic diversity in children's oncology clinical trials: ten years later.儿童肿瘤学临床试验中的种族/族裔多样性:十年后
Cancer. 2009 Aug 15;115(16):3808-16. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24437.
9
Racial differences in parents' distrust of medicine and research.父母对医学和研究不信任方面的种族差异。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Feb;163(2):108-14. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.521.
10
Prenatal care and delivery room staff attitudes toward research and the National Children's Study.产前护理及产房工作人员对研究和国家儿童研究的态度。
Matern Child Health J. 2008 Nov;12(6):684-91. doi: 10.1007/s10995-008-0393-6. Epub 2008 Jul 31.

向家长宣传儿科研究:儿童与临床研究网站的定性评估

Educating Parents About Pediatric Research: Children and Clinical Studies Website Qualitative Evaluation.

作者信息

Marceau Lisa D, Welch Lisa C, Pemberton Victoria L, Pearson Gail D

机构信息

New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA

Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2016 Jul;26(8):1114-22. doi: 10.1177/1049732315616620. Epub 2015 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1177/1049732315616620
PMID:26711142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5527330/
Abstract

A gap in information about pediatric clinical trials exists, and parents remain uncertain about what is involved in research studies involving children. We aimed to understand parent perspectives about pediatric clinical research after viewing the online Children and Clinical Studies (CaCS) program. Using a qualitative descriptive study design, we conducted focus groups with parents and phone interviews with physicians. Three themes emerged providing approaches to improve parent's understanding of clinical research by including strategies where parents (a) hear from parents like themselves to learn about pediatric research, (b) receive general clinical research information to complement study-specific details, and (c) are provided more information about the role of healthy child volunteers. Parents found the website a valuable tool that would help them make a decision about what it means to participate in research. This tool can assist parents, providers, and researchers by connecting general information with study-specific information.

摘要

关于儿科临床试验的信息存在缺口,家长们对于涉及儿童的研究项目所包含的内容仍不确定。我们旨在了解家长在观看在线儿童与临床研究(CaCS)项目后对儿科临床研究的看法。采用定性描述性研究设计,我们对家长进行了焦点小组访谈,并对医生进行了电话访谈。出现了三个主题,提出了通过以下策略来提高家长对临床研究的理解:(a)让家长听取与自己情况相似的家长的经验,以了解儿科研究;(b)提供一般临床研究信息以补充特定研究细节;(c)提供更多关于健康儿童志愿者角色的信息。家长们发现该网站是一个有价值的工具,有助于他们决定参与研究意味着什么。这个工具可以通过将一般信息与特定研究信息联系起来,帮助家长、医疗服务提供者和研究人员。