• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产前护理及产房工作人员对研究和国家儿童研究的态度。

Prenatal care and delivery room staff attitudes toward research and the National Children's Study.

作者信息

Mudd Lanay M, Pham Xinh, Nechuta Sarah, Elliott Michael R, Lepkowski James M, Paneth Nigel

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Michigan State University, B601 West Fee Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2008 Nov;12(6):684-91. doi: 10.1007/s10995-008-0393-6. Epub 2008 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1007/s10995-008-0393-6
PMID:18668359
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The cooperation of healthcare personnel is essential for implementing clinical research, yet little is known about the willingness of staff to facilitate research. This study assessed attitudes of prenatal clinic and delivery room (DR) staff toward facilitation of research, with a particular focus on the National Children's Study (NCS).

METHODS

Staff from seven sampled prenatal clinics (N=82) and all three DRs in Kent County, MI (N=169) completed anonymous surveys assessing willingness to recruit patients (clinic) or collect biological specimens (DR), desired incentives, and barriers to research in general and the NCS specifically.

RESULTS

Clinic staff included 36 office workers, 29 nurses, 11 medical assistants and 6 physicians/physician assistants. DR staff included 127 nurses, 19 support staff, 11 physicians and 10 technicians. Clinic staff would hand out brochures (72%) and describe studies (65%), but only 44% wanted outside research staff to recruit patients. Non-White staff were 4.1 times more likely (95% CI. 1.2-14.1) to permit outside staff to recruit. DR staff would collect placentas (84%) and cord blood (77%), and preferred DR staff to perform the collections. In both settings, financial incentives were not required or were modest. Lack of time was the most reported research barrier, followed by patient flow and lack of space. A small fraction of healthcare workers reported refusal to facilitate research tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful planning of research with all clinic and DR staff will be necessary for successful execution of the NCS or other large-scale clinical research studies.

摘要

目的

医护人员的合作对于开展临床研究至关重要,但对于工作人员协助研究的意愿却知之甚少。本研究评估了产前诊所和产房(DR)工作人员对协助研究的态度,特别关注了国家儿童研究(NCS)。

方法

来自密歇根州肯特县七家抽样产前诊所(N = 82)和所有三家产房(N = 169)的工作人员完成了匿名调查,评估招募患者(诊所)或收集生物标本(产房)的意愿、期望的激励措施以及一般研究和NCS研究的障碍。

结果

诊所工作人员包括36名办公室工作人员、29名护士、11名医疗助理和6名医生/医师助理。产房工作人员包括127名护士、19名辅助人员、11名医生和10名技术人员。诊所工作人员会分发宣传册(72%)并描述研究(65%),但只有44%希望外部研究人员招募患者。非白人工作人员允许外部人员招募的可能性高4.1倍(95%可信区间:1.2 - 14.1)。产房工作人员会收集胎盘(84%)和脐带血(77%),并更倾向于由产房工作人员进行采集。在这两种情况下,都不需要或只需适度的经济激励。报告最多的研究障碍是时间不足,其次是患者流量和空间不足。一小部分医护人员报告拒绝协助研究任务。

结论

要成功实施NCS或其他大规模临床研究,必须与所有诊所和产房工作人员精心规划研究。

相似文献

1
Prenatal care and delivery room staff attitudes toward research and the National Children's Study.产前护理及产房工作人员对研究和国家儿童研究的态度。
Matern Child Health J. 2008 Nov;12(6):684-91. doi: 10.1007/s10995-008-0393-6. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
2
Discordant attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trial participation between physicians, research staff, and cancer patients.医生、研究人员和癌症患者对癌症临床试验参与的态度和信念存在差异。
Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;17(2):184-194. doi: 10.1177/1740774520901514. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
3
Attitudes of pregnant women towards participation in perinatal epidemiological research.孕妇对参与围产流行病学研究的态度。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;23(5):424-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01058.x.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
The contribution of the Patient Support Assistant to direct patient care: an exploration of nursing and PSA role perceptions.患者支持助理对直接患者护理的贡献:对护理和患者支持助理角色认知的探索。
Contemp Nurse. 2007 Apr;24(2):175-88. doi: 10.5172/conu.2007.24.2.175.
6
Nurses' attitudes toward pregnancy termination in the labor and delivery setting.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 Jul-Aug;33(4):472-9. doi: 10.1177/0884217504266912.
7
Facilitation of child health research in hospital settings: The views of nurses.促进医院环境中的儿童健康研究:护士的观点。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Mar;27(5-6):1004-1014. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14079. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
8
How acceptable are financial incentives and written feedback for improving hypertension control? Perspectives from physicians, clinic administrators, and patients.经济激励措施和书面反馈对于改善高血压控制的可接受程度如何?来自医生、诊所管理人员和患者的观点。
Am J Manag Care. 2002 May;8(5):441-7.
9
Pharmacist-provided services and community pharmacist integration into a patient-centered medical home: A qualitative study of primary care clinic staff perceptions.药剂师提供的服务和社区药剂师融入以患者为中心的医疗之家:对初级保健诊所工作人员认知的定性研究。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 Jul-Aug;59(4S):S6-S11.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 May 14.
10
"I came to escort someone": Men's experiences of antenatal care services in urban Ghana-a qualitative study.“我来护送某人”:加纳城市男性参与产前保健服务的经历——一项定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2021 May 26;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01152-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Perinatal Care Provider Perspectives on Integrating Clinical Research Into the Clinical Infrastructure.围产期护理提供者对将临床研究整合到临床基础设施中的看法。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2025 Mar-Apr;70(2):301-307. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13703. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
Educating Parents About Pediatric Research: Children and Clinical Studies Website Qualitative Evaluation.向家长宣传儿科研究:儿童与临床研究网站的定性评估
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jul;26(8):1114-22. doi: 10.1177/1049732315616620. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
3
Nurses' Attitudes Toward Clinical Research: Experience of the Therapeutic Hypothermia After Pediatric Cardiac Arrest Trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Nurses' attitudes toward nursing research at a metropolitan medical center.
Appl Nurs Res. 2007 Feb;20(1):24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.11.003.
2
The National Children's Study: a 21-year prospective study of 100,000 American children.全国儿童研究:对10万名美国儿童进行的为期21年的前瞻性研究。
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):2173-86. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0360.
3
An exploration of factors which constrain nurses from research participation.对限制护士参与研究的因素的探索。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):535-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01374.x.
护士对临床研究的态度:小儿心脏骤停后治疗性低温试验的经验
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar;17(3):e121-9. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000609.
4
Pregnancy recruitment for population research: the National Children's Study vanguard experience in Wayne County, Michigan.孕期人群研究招募:密歇根州韦恩县的全国儿童研究先锋队经验。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013 May;27(3):303-11. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12047.
5
Children and clinical studies: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's new multimedia resource for pediatric research.儿童与临床研究:美国国立心肺血液研究所的新型儿科研究多媒体资源
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 4;54(6):502-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.041.
4
Making the National Children's Study a real partnership with academic pediatrics.
J Pediatr. 2005 Nov;147(5):563-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.08.071.
5
General practitioners' attitudes towards research in primary care: qualitative results of a cross sectional study.全科医生对初级保健研究的态度:一项横断面研究的定性结果
BMC Fam Pract. 2004 Dec 21;5(1):31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-5-31.
6
Attitudes of health-care providers towards research with newborn babies.医疗保健提供者对新生儿研究的态度。
J Perinatol. 2004 Dec;24(12):775-82. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211171.
7
Factors that influence doctors' participation in clinical research.影响医生参与临床研究的因素。
Med Educ. 2004 Aug;38(8):848-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01895.x.
8
Research knowledge, attitudes and practices of health professionals.
Nurs Outlook. 2003 Jul-Aug;51(4):165-70. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6554(03)00112-x.
9
General practice research: attitudes and involvement of Queensland general practitioners.全科医学研究:昆士兰全科医生的态度与参与情况
Med J Aust. 2002 Jul 15;177(2):74-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04670.x.
10
Factors affecting general practitioner involvement in a randomised controlled trial in primary care.影响全科医生参与初级保健随机对照试验的因素。
N Z Med J. 2002 Apr 12;115(1151):153-5.