• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教师评估计划的基本特征。

Essential features of a faculty evaluation program.

作者信息

Mackenzie R S

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 1977 Jun;41(6):301-6.

PMID:267118
Abstract

A faculty evaluation system should be developed by cooperation between evaluation specialists and dental faculty. The system should depend on a broad spectrum of data collected from a variety of sources in order to reduce personal bias and subjective judgments concerning the performance of all faculty members. Its primary purpose should be to help faculty improve and to this end should be linked to both a faculty development program and a reward system. The criteria for each faculty member's evaluation should be clearly specified in advance and be directly linked to his duties. Department and college goals must be considered as well as the individual faculty member's own interests. Standards or criteria for both rewards and sanctions should be clearly defined, and guidelines for the operation of the system should be given to each participant. The system itself should not cost more than the benefits derived from it justify, and adequate resources should be allocated to make the system effective.

摘要

教师评估系统应由评估专家和牙科教师合作开发。该系统应依赖于从各种来源收集的广泛数据,以减少有关所有教师表现的个人偏见和主观判断。其主要目的应是帮助教师改进,为此应与教师发展计划和奖励系统挂钩。每位教师的评估标准应提前明确规定,并直接与其职责相关。必须考虑部门和学院的目标以及教师个人的利益。奖励和制裁的标准或准则都应明确界定,并应向每个参与者提供系统操作指南。系统本身的成本不应超过其带来的收益,应分配足够的资源以使系统有效运行。

相似文献

1
Essential features of a faculty evaluation program.教师评估计划的基本特征。
J Dent Educ. 1977 Jun;41(6):301-6.
2
Faculty evaluation at the University of Kentucky.肯塔基大学的教师评估
J Dent Educ. 1977 Jun;41(6):335-7.
3
Faculty evaluation: review of the literature most pertinent to dental education.教师评估:对与牙科教育最相关的文献进行综述。
J Dent Educ. 1977 Jun;41(6):290-300.
4
Dental education and evidence-based educational best practices: bridging the great divide.牙科教育与循证教育最佳实践:弥合巨大差距。
J Dent Educ. 2004 Dec;68(12):1266-71.
5
Evaluation of teaching performance in U.S. dental schools.美国牙科院校教学表现评估
J Dent Educ. 1988 Feb;52(2):102-7.
6
Reflections on academic careers by current dental school faculty.现任牙科学院教员对学术生涯的思考。
J Dent Educ. 2008 Apr;72(4):448-57.
7
Goals, costs, and outcomes of a predoctoral student research program.博士生研究项目的目标、成本与成果。
J Dent Educ. 2002 Dec;66(12):1368-73.
8
Faculty behavior: appraisal and rewards.教师行为:评估与奖励。
J Dent Educ. 1977 Jun;41(6):307-19.
9
Ongoing faculty evaluations: developmental gain or just more pain?持续的教师评估:是发展进步还是徒增痛苦?
Curr Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb;63(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2005.08.010.
10
Adapting industry-style business model to academia in a system of Performance-based Incentive Compensation.在基于绩效的激励薪酬体系中将行业式商业模式应用于学术界。
Acad Med. 2008 Jan;83(1):76-84. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31815c6508.