Doyle Rebecca E, Lee Caroline, McGill David M, Mendl Michael
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, The University of Melbourne , Parkville , Australia ; Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University) , Wagga Wagga , Australia.
Agriculture, CSIRO , Armidale, NSW , Australia.
PeerJ. 2015 Dec 14;3:e1510. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1510. eCollection 2015.
New tests of animal affect and welfare require validation in subjects experiencing putatively different states. Pharmacological manipulations of affective state are advantageous because they can be administered in a standardised fashion, and the duration of their action can be established and tailored to suit the length of a particular test. To this end, the current study aimed to evaluate a pharmacological model of high and low anxiety in an important agricultural and laboratory species, the sheep. Thirty-five 8-month-old female sheep received either an intramuscular injection of the putatively anxiogenic drug 1-(m-chlorophenyl)piperazine (mCPP; 1 mg/kg; n = 12), an intravenous injection of the putatively anxiolytic drug diazepam (0.1 mg/kg; n = 12), or acted as a control (saline intramuscular injection n = 11). Thirty minutes after the treatments, sheep were individually exposed to a variety of tests assessing their general movement, performance in a 'runway task' (moving down a raceway for a food reward), response to startle, and behaviour in isolation. A test to assess feeding motivation was performed 2 days later following administration of the drugs to the same animals in the same manner. The mCPP sheep had poorer performance in the two runway tasks (6.8 and 7.7 × slower respectively than control group; p < 0.001), a greater startle response (1.4 vs. 0.6; p = 0.02), a higher level of movement during isolation (9.1 steps vs. 5.4; p < 0.001), and a lower feeding motivation (1.8 × slower; p < 0.001) than the control group, all of which act as indicators of anxiety. These results show that mCPP is an effective pharmacological model of high anxiety in sheep. Comparatively, the sheep treated with diazepam did not display any differences compared to the control sheep. Thus we suggest that mCPP is an effective treatment to validate future tests aimed at assessing anxiety in sheep, and that future studies should include other subtle indicators of positive affective states, as well as dosage studies, so conclusions on the efficacy of diazepam as a model of low anxiety can be drawn.
动物情感和福利的新测试需要在处于假定不同状态的实验对象中进行验证。情感状态的药理学操纵具有优势,因为它们可以以标准化方式给药,并且其作用持续时间可以确定并调整以适应特定测试的时长。为此,当前研究旨在评估重要农业和实验动物物种绵羊的高焦虑和低焦虑药理学模型。35只8月龄雌性绵羊分别接受肌肉注射假定的致焦虑药物1-(间氯苯基)哌嗪(mCPP;1毫克/千克;n = 12)、静脉注射假定的抗焦虑药物地西泮(0.1毫克/千克;n = 12),或作为对照(肌肉注射生理盐水,n = 11)。治疗30分钟后,绵羊被单独置于各种测试中,以评估它们的一般活动、在“跑道任务”(沿跑道移动以获取食物奖励)中的表现、惊吓反应以及独处时的行为。在以相同方式给相同动物给药2天后,进行了一项评估进食动机的测试。与对照组相比,mCPP处理的绵羊在两项跑道任务中的表现较差(分别比对照组慢6.8倍和7.7倍;p < 0.001),惊吓反应更大(1.4对0.6;p = 0.02),独处时的活动水平更高(9.1步对5.4步;p < 0.001),进食动机更低(慢1.8倍;p < 0.001),所有这些都作为焦虑的指标。这些结果表明,mCPP是绵羊高焦虑的有效药理学模型。相比之下,接受地西泮治疗的绵羊与对照绵羊相比没有表现出任何差异。因此,我们建议mCPP是验证未来旨在评估绵羊焦虑测试的有效方法,并且未来的研究应包括积极情感状态的其他细微指标以及剂量研究,以便能够得出关于地西泮作为低焦虑模型有效性的结论。