• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜手术:一项合格的系统评价。

Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review.

作者信息

Buia Alexander, Stockhausen Florian, Hanisch Ernst

机构信息

Alexander Buia, Florian Stockhausen, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, St. Elisabethen-Krankenhaus, Academic Teaching Hospital Goethe-University Frankfurt, D-60487 Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

World J Methodol. 2015 Dec 26;5(4):238-54. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v5.i4.238.

DOI:10.5662/wjm.v5.i4.238
PMID:26713285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4686422/
Abstract

AIM

To review current applications of the laparoscopic surgery while highlighting the standard procedures across different fields.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was undertaken using the PubMed Advanced Search Builder. A total of 321 articles were found in this search. The following criteria had to be met for the publication to be selected: Review article, randomized controlled trials, or meta-analyses discussing the subject of laparoscopic surgery. In addition, publications were hand-searched in the Cochrane database and the high-impact journals. A total of 82 of the findings were included according to matching the inclusion criteria. Overall, 403 full-text articles were reviewed. Of these, 218 were excluded due to not matching the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 185 relevant articles were identified matching the search criteria for an overview of the current literature on the laparoscopic surgery. Articles covered the period from the first laparoscopic application through its tremendous advancement over the last several years. Overall, the biggest advantage of the procedure has been minimizing trauma to the abdominal wall compared with open surgery. In the case of cholecystectomy, fundoplication, and adrenalectomy, the procedure has become the gold standard without being proven as a superior technique over the open surgery in randomized controlled trials. Faster recovery, reduced hospital stay, and a quicker return to normal activities are the most evident advantages of the laparoscopic surgery. Positive outcomes, efficiency, a lower rate of wound infections, and reduction in the perioperative morbidity of minimally invasive procedures have been shown in most indications.

CONCLUSION

Improvements in surgical training and developments in instruments, imaging, and surgical techniques have greatly increased safety and feasibility of the laparoscopic surgical procedures.

摘要

目的

回顾腹腔镜手术的当前应用,同时强调不同领域的标准手术流程。

方法

使用PubMed高级搜索构建器进行全面搜索。此次搜索共找到321篇文章。入选发表文章需满足以下标准:综述文章、随机对照试验或讨论腹腔镜手术主题的荟萃分析。此外,还在Cochrane数据库和高影响力期刊中进行了手工检索。根据符合纳入标准,共纳入82项研究结果。总体而言,共审查了403篇全文文章。其中,218篇因不符合纳入标准而被排除。

结果

共确定了185篇相关文章,符合腹腔镜手术当前文献综述的搜索标准。文章涵盖了从首次腹腔镜应用到过去几年其巨大进展的时间段。总体而言,与开放手术相比,该手术最大的优势是将对腹壁的创伤降至最低。在胆囊切除术、胃底折叠术和肾上腺切除术的情况下,该手术已成为金标准,但在随机对照试验中并未被证明是优于开放手术的技术。恢复更快、住院时间缩短以及更快恢复正常活动是腹腔镜手术最明显的优势。在大多数适应症中,已显示出积极的结果、高效性、较低的伤口感染率以及微创手术围手术期发病率的降低。

结论

手术培训的改进以及器械、成像和手术技术的发展极大地提高了腹腔镜手术的安全性和可行性。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review.腹腔镜手术:一项合格的系统评价。
World J Methodol. 2015 Dec 26;5(4):238-54. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v5.i4.238.
2
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗直肠癌:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(22):9985-96. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.22.9985.
3
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 3(9):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub3.
4
Hand assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal surgery.结直肠手术中手辅助腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10):CD006585. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006585.pub2.
5
The effectiveness of non-invasive complementary therapies in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting following abdominal laparoscopic surgery in women: a systematic review.非侵入性辅助疗法对减轻女性腹部腹腔镜手术后恶心和呕吐的有效性:一项系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(19):850-907. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907190-00001.
6
7
Open versus laparoscopic approach for intestinal malrotation in infants and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.婴儿和儿童肠旋转不良的开放手术与腹腔镜手术治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2016 Dec;32(12):1157-1164. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-3974-2. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.机器人切除术与腹腔镜直肠切除术治疗癌症的比较:短期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;14(4):e134-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02907.x.
10
Minimally invasive: minimally reimbursed? An examination of six laparoscopic surgical procedures.微创:报销微薄?六种腹腔镜手术的调查。
Surg Innov. 2005 Sep;12(3):261-87. doi: 10.1177/155335060501200313.

引用本文的文献

1
Design of Automatic Tool Replacement Mechanism for Laparoscopic Surgical Robot Arm for Solo Surgery.用于单人手术的腹腔镜手术机器人手臂自动换刀机构设计
Int J Med Robot. 2025 Oct;21(5):e70106. doi: 10.1002/rcs.70106.
2
Risk factors for and a prediction nomogram of physical frailty in older patients hospitalized with acute calculous cholecystitis.急性结石性胆囊炎住院老年患者身体衰弱的危险因素及预测列线图
Glob Health Med. 2025 Aug 31;7(4):294-305. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2025.01075.
3
Concurrent Acute Appendicitis and Cholecystitis: A Systematic Literature Review.并发急性阑尾炎和胆囊炎:一项系统文献综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 15;14(14):5019. doi: 10.3390/jcm14145019.
4
First-in-human robot-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid resection using ANSUR surgical unit.使用ANSUR手术单元进行的首例人体机器人辅助腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术。
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jul 18;29(1):142. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03183-7.
5
Retrieving the lost needle during abdominal and pelvic minimally invasive surgeries: a literature review.腹部和盆腔微创手术中丢失针的找回:文献综述
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 27;19(1):329. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02463-6.
6
A Comprehensive Video Dataset for Surgical Laparoscopic Action Analysis.用于手术腹腔镜动作分析的综合视频数据集
Sci Data. 2025 May 24;12(1):862. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05093-7.
7
Comparing Safety and Efficacy: Laparoscopic vs. Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.比较安全性和有效性:腹腔镜与开放胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;16(2):432-442. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02132-4. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
8
Automatic gesture recognition and evaluation in peg transfer tasks of laparoscopic surgery training.腹腔镜手术训练中栓子转移任务的自动手势识别与评估
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun;39(6):3749-3759. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11730-4. Epub 2025 May 2.
9
The Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgical Modality and Task Complexity on Cognitive Workload: An fNIRS Study.微创手术方式和任务复杂性对认知工作量的影响:一项功能近红外光谱研究。
Brain Sci. 2025 Apr 8;15(4):387. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15040387.
10
Vision techniques for anatomical structures in laparoscopic surgery: a comprehensive review.腹腔镜手术中解剖结构的视觉技术:全面综述。
Front Surg. 2025 Apr 14;12:1557153. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1557153. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme.针对有或没有加速康复外科(ERAS)方案的腹腔镜与开放结肠手术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3443-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4148-3. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
2
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Mar;25(3):187-95. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0431.
3
Current status of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: A literature review to highlight studies limits.胃癌微创手术的现状:文献综述强调研究局限性。
Int J Surg. 2015 May;17:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.02.021. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
4
A systematic review of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.腹腔镜胃癌全胃切除术的系统评价。
Gastric Cancer. 2015 Apr;18(2):218-26. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0474-3. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
5
Can we expand the indications for laparoscopic liver resection? A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic liver resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease.我们能否扩大腹腔镜肝切除术的适应症?一项关于肝细胞癌和慢性肝病患者腹腔镜肝切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 May;22(5):342-52. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.215. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
6
Meta-analysis and systematic review of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for elective incisional hernia.腹腔镜与开放网片修补术治疗择期切口疝的Meta分析和系统评价
Hernia. 2015 Jun;19(3):449-63. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1351-z. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
7
Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy reduced surgical site infection as compared with open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in a meta-analysis of both randomized controlled and case-controlled studies.腹腔镜远端胃切除术与开腹远端胃切除术相比,可降低胃癌患者的手术部位感染风险:一项随机对照和病例对照研究的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2015 Mar;15:61-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.030. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
8
Systematic review of surgical treatment of subclinical Cushing's syndrome.亚临床库欣综合征的手术治疗的系统评价。
Br J Surg. 2015 Mar;102(4):318-30. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9742. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
9
The role of bilateral adrenalectomy in the treatment of refractory Cushing's disease.双侧肾上腺切除术在难治性库欣病治疗中的作用。
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Feb;38(2):E9. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.FOCUS14684.
10
Long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌切除术的长期生存结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jan;94(4):e454. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000454.