• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and Mental Health Problems Among Children With Hearing Loss.《优势与困难问卷》的心理测量特性及听力损失儿童的心理健康问题
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016 Apr;21(2):129-40. doi: 10.1093/deafed/env067. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
2
Psychometric properties of the parent strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: results of the BELLA study.德国儿童和青少年普通人群中父母版优势与困难问卷的心理测量特性:贝拉研究结果
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;17 Suppl 1:99-105. doi: 10.1007/s00787-008-1011-2.
3
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for preschool children-a Swedish validation.学前儿童优势与困难问卷(SDQ)——瑞典的验证研究
Nord J Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;70(8):567-74. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2016.1184309. Epub 2016 May 31.
4
Mental health difficulties in children and adolescents: The study of the SDQ in the Spanish National Health Survey 2011-2012.儿童和青少年的心理健康问题:2011-2012 年西班牙国家健康调查中的 SDQ 研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jan;259:236-242. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
5
Emotional and behavioural problems in Swedish preschool children rated by preschool teachers with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).瑞典学前儿童的情绪和行为问题,由学前教师使用长处和困难问卷(SDQ)进行评估。
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Apr 21;17(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0864-2.
6
Dutch norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - parent form for children aged 2-18 years.荷兰版《长处和困难问卷》(SDQ)- 家长用 2-18 岁儿童版。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 14;16(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0948-1.
7
A confirmatory approach to examining the factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): a large scale cohort study.采用确证性方法检验长处和困难问卷(SDQ)的因子结构:一项大规模队列研究。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Apr;41(3):355-65. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9683-y.
8
Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire(3-4) in 3-year-old preschoolers.3-4 岁学龄前儿童长处和困难问卷(SDQ)的心理测量特性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;54(3):282-91. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
9
Psychometric properties and normative data of the Latvian and Russian language versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in the Latvian general adolescent population.拉脱维亚和俄罗斯语版《长处和困难问卷》(SDQ)在拉脱维亚普通青少年人群中的心理测量学特性和常模数据。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2024 May;78(4):301-311. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2024.2319662. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
10
Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher forms of the Japanese version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.日本版优势与困难问卷家长版和教师版的心理测量特性。
Brain Dev. 2015 May;37(5):501-7. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents with hearing impairment.听力受损儿童和青少年的情绪及行为问题。
BMC Pediatr. 2025 May 9;25(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05696-4.
2
Emotional and Behavioural Problems of HIV-infected Children: Findings from a Southeastern Nigeria Tertiary Healthcare Facility.尼日利亚东南部一家三级医疗保健机构中感染艾滋病毒儿童的情绪和行为问题:研究结果
Niger Med J. 2025 Apr 3;66(1):117-126. doi: 10.71480/nmj.v66i1.639. eCollection 2025 Jan-Feb.
3
First results of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, applied as a screening tool for psychosocial difficulties in pediatric audiology.《长处和困难问卷》作为一种筛查工具在儿科听力学中用于评估心理社会困难的初步结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Oct;280(10):4467-4476. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07979-x. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
4
Predicting Quality of Life and Behavior and Emotion from Functional Auditory and Pragmatic Language Abilities in 9-Year-Old Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children.从9岁失聪和听力障碍儿童的功能性听觉和语用语言能力预测生活质量、行为及情绪
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 17;10(22):5357. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225357.
5
Prediction of child and adolescent outcomes with broadband and narrowband dimensions of internalizing and externalizing behavior using the child and adolescent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.使用儿童青少年版 strengths and difficulties questionnaire 对内外向行为的宽带和窄带维度进行儿童和青少年结果预测。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 9;15(10):e0240312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240312. eCollection 2020.
6
Comparing Parent and Teacher Ratings of Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties in 5-year old Children who are Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing.比较失聪或听力障碍5岁儿童的父母与教师对其情绪和行为问题的评分
Deafness Educ Int. 2020;22(1):3-26. doi: 10.1080/14643154.2018.1475956. Epub 2018 May 24.
7
"EspaiJove.net"- a school-based intervention programme to promote mental health and eradicate stigma in the adolescent population: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.“EspaiJove.net”- 一项基于学校的干预计划,旨在促进青少年的心理健康并消除污名化:一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 31;18(1):939. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5855-1.
8
Emotional and behaviour difficulties in teenagers with permanent childhood hearing loss.患有永久性儿童听力损失的青少年的情绪和行为问题
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Oct;101:186-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.07.031. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
9
Psychosocial development of 5-year-old children with hearing loss: Risks and protective factors.5岁听力损失儿童的心理社会发展:风险与保护因素
Int J Audiol. 2018 May;57(sup2):S81-S92. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1211764. Epub 2016 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Emotional and behavioural difficulties in children and adolescents with hearing impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.听力受损儿童和青少年的情绪及行为问题:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 May;24(5):477-96. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0697-1. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
2
Psychopathology and its risk and protective factors in hearing-impaired children and adolescents: a systematic review.听力障碍儿童和青少年的精神病理学及其风险和保护因素:系统评价。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Feb;168(2):170-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3974.
3
Disability as a risk factor? Development of psychopathology in children with disabilities.残疾作为风险因素?残疾儿童精神病理学的发展。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Oct;34(10):3607-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.022. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
4
A confirmatory approach to examining the factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): a large scale cohort study.采用确证性方法检验长处和困难问卷(SDQ)的因子结构:一项大规模队列研究。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Apr;41(3):355-65. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9683-y.
5
Mental health of deaf people.聋人心理健康。
Lancet. 2012 Mar 17;379(9820):1037-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61143-4.
6
Psychometric properties of the Danish Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: the SDQ assessed for more than 70,000 raters in four different cohorts.丹麦长处与困难问卷的心理测量学特性:SDQ 在四个不同队列中对超过 70,000 名评估者进行了评估。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032025. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
7
Outcomes in cochlear implantation: variables affecting performance in adults and children.人工耳蜗植入的结果:影响成人和儿童表现的变量
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012 Feb;45(1):155-71. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2011.08.023.
8
Depression in hearing-impaired children.听力受损儿童的抑郁症。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Oct;75(10):1313-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.07.023.
9
Prevalence of the ADHD phenotype in 7- to 9-year-old children: effects of informant, gender and non-participation.7 至 9 岁儿童注意缺陷多动障碍表型的流行率:信息提供者、性别和不参与的影响。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 May;47(5):763-9. doi: 10.1007/s00127-011-0379-3. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
10
The mental health of deaf adolescents with cochlear implants compared to their hearing peers.聋人青少年使用人工耳蜗后的心理健康状况与听力正常同龄人相比。
Int J Audiol. 2011 Mar;50(3):146-54. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.533704. Epub 2011 Feb 10.

《优势与困难问卷》的心理测量特性及听力损失儿童的心理健康问题

Psychometric Properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and Mental Health Problems Among Children With Hearing Loss.

作者信息

Niclasen Janni, Dammeyer Jesper

机构信息

University of Copenhagen

University of Copenhagen.

出版信息

J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016 Apr;21(2):129-40. doi: 10.1093/deafed/env067. Epub 2015 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1093/deafed/env067
PMID:26714489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4886320/
Abstract

More knowledge is needed about the characteristics of mental health problems among deaf or hard of hearing (D/HH) children. This study investigates the factor structure of one of the most widely used screening tools, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and the prevalence of mental health problems among D/HH children. Our data were derived from two independent samples of D/HH children, one from 2007 of children (N = 334) in bilingual/bicultural educational programs and another from 2014 of children (N = 233) in mostly mainstream oral educational programs with cochlear implants. Teacher-SDQs were collected for the 2007 sample and parent-SDQs for the 2014 sample. The factor structure of the SDQ was examined from both Exploratory Factor Analytic (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analytic (CFA) perspectives and internal consistency was examined. Mean problem scores were presented. The five-factor structure of the SDQ was overall found for both the 2007 and the 2014 samples using EFA. However, problems with the Conduct scale and the reversed items loading onto the Prosocial scale were observed. The five-factor model was superior to a one- and a two-factor model from a CFA perspective in both samples. Better internal consistency was observed for the 2007 sample rated by teachers. Both samples showed higher mean scores on all SDQ problem subscales compared to a cohort of Danish children without hearing loss. The five-factor structure of the SDQ is recommended to be used among D/HH children.

摘要

对于失聪或听力障碍(D/HH)儿童心理健康问题的特征,我们还需要了解更多。本研究调查了最广泛使用的筛查工具之一——优势与困难问卷(SDQ)的因子结构,以及D/HH儿童心理健康问题的患病率。我们的数据来自两个独立的D/HH儿童样本,一个是2007年参加双语/双文化教育项目的儿童样本(N = 334),另一个是2014年主要参加主流口语教育项目并植入人工耳蜗的儿童样本(N = 233)。2007年的样本收集了教师填写的SDQ,2014年的样本收集了家长填写的SDQ。从探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)两个角度检验了SDQ的因子结构,并检验了内部一致性。给出了平均问题得分。使用EFA对2007年和2014年的样本总体上都发现了SDQ的五因子结构。然而,观察到行为量表存在问题,且反向项目加载到亲社会量表上。从CFA角度来看,在两个样本中,五因子模型均优于单因子和双因子模型。2007年由教师评分的样本显示出更好的内部一致性。与一组没有听力损失的丹麦儿童相比,两个样本在所有SDQ问题子量表上的平均得分都更高。建议在D/HH儿童中使用SDQ的五因子结构。