Niclasen Janni, Dammeyer Jesper
University of Copenhagen
University of Copenhagen.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016 Apr;21(2):129-40. doi: 10.1093/deafed/env067. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
More knowledge is needed about the characteristics of mental health problems among deaf or hard of hearing (D/HH) children. This study investigates the factor structure of one of the most widely used screening tools, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and the prevalence of mental health problems among D/HH children. Our data were derived from two independent samples of D/HH children, one from 2007 of children (N = 334) in bilingual/bicultural educational programs and another from 2014 of children (N = 233) in mostly mainstream oral educational programs with cochlear implants. Teacher-SDQs were collected for the 2007 sample and parent-SDQs for the 2014 sample. The factor structure of the SDQ was examined from both Exploratory Factor Analytic (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analytic (CFA) perspectives and internal consistency was examined. Mean problem scores were presented. The five-factor structure of the SDQ was overall found for both the 2007 and the 2014 samples using EFA. However, problems with the Conduct scale and the reversed items loading onto the Prosocial scale were observed. The five-factor model was superior to a one- and a two-factor model from a CFA perspective in both samples. Better internal consistency was observed for the 2007 sample rated by teachers. Both samples showed higher mean scores on all SDQ problem subscales compared to a cohort of Danish children without hearing loss. The five-factor structure of the SDQ is recommended to be used among D/HH children.
对于失聪或听力障碍(D/HH)儿童心理健康问题的特征,我们还需要了解更多。本研究调查了最广泛使用的筛查工具之一——优势与困难问卷(SDQ)的因子结构,以及D/HH儿童心理健康问题的患病率。我们的数据来自两个独立的D/HH儿童样本,一个是2007年参加双语/双文化教育项目的儿童样本(N = 334),另一个是2014年主要参加主流口语教育项目并植入人工耳蜗的儿童样本(N = 233)。2007年的样本收集了教师填写的SDQ,2014年的样本收集了家长填写的SDQ。从探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)两个角度检验了SDQ的因子结构,并检验了内部一致性。给出了平均问题得分。使用EFA对2007年和2014年的样本总体上都发现了SDQ的五因子结构。然而,观察到行为量表存在问题,且反向项目加载到亲社会量表上。从CFA角度来看,在两个样本中,五因子模型均优于单因子和双因子模型。2007年由教师评分的样本显示出更好的内部一致性。与一组没有听力损失的丹麦儿童相比,两个样本在所有SDQ问题子量表上的平均得分都更高。建议在D/HH儿童中使用SDQ的五因子结构。