Liu Quanzhong, Chen Haibo, Xi Liyan, Hong Zhen, He Li, Fu Yi, Fang Hong, Shang Ningxiu, Yan Ping, Fan Dongsheng
Dermatology Department, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Neurology Department, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.
Pain Pract. 2017 Jan;17(1):62-69. doi: 10.1111/papr.12413. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
Currently, there are limited options for treatment of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) patients in China. While pregabalin is an effective treatment option for PHN in several countries, there is limited information on its efficacy in Chinese patients.
This was an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Chinese patients with PHN randomized (1:1) to pregabalin 300 mg/day or placebo. Primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in mean pain score (Daily Pain Rating Scale; 0 = 'no pain' to 10 = 'worst possible pain'). Secondary efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in overall pain intensity score, by visual analog scale (VAS; 0 = 'no pain' to 100 = 'worst possible pain') and daily sleep interference score (0 = 'pain does not interfere with sleep' to 10 = 'completely interferes').
A total of 220 patients were randomized and received treatment (111 pregabalin and 109 placebo). Improvement in mean pain score with pregabalin was significantly greater than placebo, least squares mean difference (95% CI), -0.71 (-1.08, -0.34); P = 0.0002. Improvements in VAS and sleep interference score at endpoint were significantly greater with pregabalin than placebo, least squares mean difference (95% CI), -8.18 (-11.99, -4.37); P < 0.0001, and -0.54 (-0.93, -0.14); P = 0.0079, respectively. Adverse events were consistent with current product labeling, with dizziness the most commonly reported adverse event (24.3% of pregabalin-treated patients).
Pregabalin improved measures of pain and sleep, and is well tolerated in Chinese patients with PHN. These results may inform physicians treating patients with PHN in China.
目前,中国带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)患者的治疗选择有限。虽然普瑞巴林在多个国家是治疗PHN的有效药物,但关于其在中国患者中的疗效信息有限。
这是一项为期8周的双盲、安慰剂对照试验,将中国PHN患者随机(1:1)分为普瑞巴林300毫克/天组或安慰剂组。主要疗效终点是平均疼痛评分相对于基线的变化(每日疼痛评定量表;0 =“无疼痛”至10 =“可能的最严重疼痛”)。次要疗效终点包括视觉模拟量表(VAS;0 =“无疼痛”至100 =“可能的最严重疼痛”)评估的总体疼痛强度评分相对于基线的变化以及每日睡眠干扰评分(0 =“疼痛不干扰睡眠”至10 =“完全干扰睡眠”)。
共有220例患者被随机分组并接受治疗(111例普瑞巴林组和109例安慰剂组)。普瑞巴林组平均疼痛评分的改善显著大于安慰剂组,最小二乘均值差异(95%CI)为-0.71(-1.08,-0.34);P = 0.0002。终点时,普瑞巴林组VAS和睡眠干扰评分的改善显著大于安慰剂组,最小二乘均值差异(95%CI)分别为-8.18(-11.99,-4.37);P < 0.0001和-0.54(-0.93,-0.14);P = 0.0079。不良事件与当前产品标签一致,头晕是最常报告的不良事件(普瑞巴林治疗患者中的24.3%)。
普瑞巴林改善了疼痛和睡眠指标,在中国PHN患者中耐受性良好。这些结果可为中国治疗PHN患者的医生提供参考。