Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 21;9(1):e023600. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023600.
To assess the benefits and harms of pregabalin in the management of neuropathic pain.
Rapid review and meta-analysis of phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled trials.
Adults aged 18 years and above with neuropathic pain defined according to the International Association for the Study of Pain criteria.
Pregabalin or placebo.
Our primary outcomes were pain (as measured using validated scales) and adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were sleep disturbance, quality of life, Patient Global Impression of Change, Clinician Global Impression scale, anxiety and depression scores, overall discontinuations and discontinuations because of adverse events.
We included 28 trials comprising 6087 participants. The neuropathic pain conditions studied were diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, herpes zoster, sciatica (radicular pain), poststroke pain and spinal cord injury-related pain. Patients who took pregabalin reported significant reductions in pain (numerical rating scale (NRS)) compared with placebo (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.49 (95% CI -0.66 to -0.32, p<0.00001), very low quality evidence). Pregabalin significantly reduced sleep interference scores (NRS) compared with placebo (SMD -0.38 (95% CI -0.50 to -0.26, p<0.00001), moderate quality evidence. Pregabalin significantly increased the risk of adverse events compared with placebo (RR 1.33 (95% CI 1.23 to 1.44, p<0.00001, low quality evidence)). The risks of experiencing weight gain, somnolence, dizziness, peripheral oedema, fatigue, visual disturbances, ataxia, non-peripheral oedema, vertigo and euphoria were significantly increased with pregabalin. Pregabalin was significantly more likely than placebo to lead to discontinuation of the drug because of adverse events (RR 1.91 (95% CI 1.54 to 2.37, p<0.00001), low quality evidence).
Pregabalin has beneficial effects on some symptoms of neuropathic pain. However, its use significantly increases the risk of a number of adverse events and discontinuation due to adverse events. The quality of the evidence from journal publications is low.
评估普瑞巴林治疗神经性疼痛的疗效和安全性。
对 3 期、随机、安慰剂对照试验进行快速综述和荟萃分析。
年龄 18 岁及以上、根据国际疼痛研究协会标准定义为神经性疼痛的成年人。
普瑞巴林或安慰剂。
我们的主要结局指标是疼痛(采用经过验证的量表测量)和不良事件。我们的次要结局指标是睡眠障碍、生活质量、患者整体变化印象、临床医生整体印象量表、焦虑和抑郁评分、总停药率和因不良事件停药率。
我们纳入了 28 项试验,共 6087 名参与者。研究的神经性疼痛病症包括糖尿病周围神经病变、带状疱疹后神经痛、带状疱疹、坐骨神经痛(神经根痛)、脑卒中后疼痛和脊髓损伤相关疼痛。与安慰剂相比,接受普瑞巴林治疗的患者疼痛(数字评分量表(NRS))显著减轻(标准化均数差(SMD)-0.49(95%置信区间-0.66 至-0.32,p<0.00001),极低质量证据)。与安慰剂相比,普瑞巴林显著降低了睡眠干扰评分(NRS)(SMD-0.38(95%置信区间-0.50 至-0.26,p<0.00001),中质量证据)。与安慰剂相比,普瑞巴林增加了不良事件的风险(RR 1.33(95%置信区间 1.23 至 1.44,p<0.00001),低质量证据)。与普瑞巴林相关的体重增加、嗜睡、头晕、外周水肿、疲劳、视觉障碍、共济失调、非外周水肿、眩晕和欣快的风险显著增加。与安慰剂相比,普瑞巴林因不良事件停药的可能性明显更高(RR 1.91(95%置信区间 1.54 至 2.37,p<0.00001),低质量证据)。
普瑞巴林对一些神经性疼痛症状有有益的作用。然而,它的使用显著增加了一系列不良事件的风险,并因不良事件而停药。来自期刊出版物的证据质量较低。