乳糜泻和自我报告的非乳糜泻麸质敏感性患者的饮食依从性和麸质暴露。

Diet adherence and gluten exposure in coeliac disease and self-reported non-coeliac gluten sensitivity.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Service, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Norway.

Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Norway; Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Norway.

出版信息

Clin Nutr. 2017 Feb;36(1):275-280. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.11.017. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Adherence to gluten-free diet in self reported non-coeliac gluten sensitive subjects is scarcely researched. Objectives of the study were to compare dietary adherence in coeliac disease (CD) subjects and in non-coeliac gluten sensitive (NCGS) subjects, and to estimate gluten exposure based on weighed food records and analysis of gluten content in selected food items.

SUBJECTS/METHODS: Twenty-three subjects with biopsy verified CD on a gluten-free diet and 34 HLA-DQ2 NCGS subjects on a self-instituted gluten-free diet were enrolled. The latter group was under investigation of CD. Dietary adherence was assessed by frequency questionnaire and structured forms supplied by weighed food records. For the analyses of food samples, the sandwich R5-ELISA, Ridascreen Gliadin competitive method was used.

RESULTS

There was no difference in dietary adherence between CD and NCGS subjects (83% vs 68%, p = 0.21). NCGS subjects were mainly self-educated in gluten-free diet compared to CD subjects (91% and 39%, respectively, p < 0.001). In non-adherent subjects, there was no difference in gluten exposure between CD and NCGS (10 vs 138 mg/day, p = 0.83). There was no difference in BMR-factor between CD and NCGS subjects, or between adherent and non-adherent subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Both CD and NCGS subjects were largely adherent, and adherence did not differ between the groups. Gluten exposure varied greatly, and some CD and NCGS subjects reached gluten intake above 500 mg/day, which might have considerable health effects on the individual, especially in case of coeliac disease.

摘要

背景/目的:对自身报告的非乳糜泻麸质敏感患者的无麸质饮食依从性研究甚少。本研究的目的是比较乳糜泻(CD)患者和非乳糜泻麸质敏感(NCGS)患者的饮食依从性,并根据称重食物记录和选定食物中麸质含量的分析来估计麸质暴露量。

受试者/方法:23 名经活检证实的 CD 患者(接受无麸质饮食)和 34 名 HLA-DQ2 NCGS 患者(自行实施无麸质饮食)入组。后者正在接受 CD 检查。饮食依从性通过频率问卷和称重食物记录提供的结构化表格进行评估。对于食物样本的分析,使用三明治 R5-ELISA、Ridascreen 谷蛋白竞争法。

结果

CD 和 NCGS 患者的饮食依从性没有差异(83%与 68%,p=0.21)。与 CD 患者相比,NCGS 患者主要是通过自我教育来实施无麸质饮食(分别为 91%和 39%,p<0.001)。在不依从的患者中,CD 和 NCGS 之间的麸质暴露量没有差异(分别为 10 与 138mg/天,p=0.83)。CD 和 NCGS 患者之间的基础代谢率(BMR)因素没有差异,也没有在依从和不依从患者之间存在差异。

结论

CD 和 NCGS 患者都有很大的依从性,而且两组之间的依从性没有差异。麸质暴露量差异很大,一些 CD 和 NCGS 患者的麸质摄入量达到 500mg/天以上,这可能对个体健康产生相当大的影响,特别是在乳糜泻的情况下。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索