Suppr超能文献

乳糜泻和非乳糜泻麸质敏感性患者对疫苗和无麸质食品安全的怀疑。

Skepticism Regarding Vaccine and Gluten-Free Food Safety Among Patients with Celiac Disease and Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.

The Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University, 180 Fort Washington Avenue, Suite 936, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2018 May;63(5):1158-1164. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4879-1. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been a marked increase in the adoption of the gluten-free (GF) diet.

AIMS

To query individuals with celiac disease (CD) and non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) on their beliefs toward the health effects of gluten, and safety of vaccines and GF food products.

METHODS

We distributed a Web-based survey to individuals with CD and NCGS on a CD center e-mail list. We used univariate and multivariate analysis to compare responses of respondents with CD and NCGS.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 27% (NCGS n = 217, CD n = 1291). Subjects with NCGS were more likely than those with CD to disagree with the statement that "vaccines are safe for people with celiac disease" (NCGS 41.3% vs. CD 26.4% (p < 0.0001), and were more likely to decline vaccination when offered (30.9 vs. 24.2%, p = 0.007). After adjusting for age and gender, NCGS subjects were more likely than CD subjects to avoid genetically modified (GMO) foods (aOR 2.30; 95% CI 1.71-3.10), eat only organic products (aOR 2.87; 95% CI 2.04-4.03), believe that the FDA is an unreliable source of information (aOR 1.82, 95% CI 1.26-2.64), and believe a GF diet improves energy and concentration (aOR 2.52; 95% CI 1.86-3.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with NCGS were more likely than those with CD to have doubts about vaccine safety and believe in the value of non-GMO and organic foods. Our findings suggest that the lack of reliable information on gluten and its content in food and medications may reinforce beliefs that result in a detriment to public health.

摘要

背景

无麸质(GF)饮食的采用率显著增加。

目的

调查乳糜泻(CD)和非乳糜泻麸质敏感性(NCGS)患者对麸质健康影响的看法,以及疫苗和 GF 食品的安全性。

方法

我们向 CD 中心电子邮件列表中的 CD 和 NCGS 患者分发了一份基于网络的调查。我们使用单变量和多变量分析来比较 CD 和 NCGS 患者的反应。

结果

总体回复率为 27%(NCGS n=217,CD n=1291)。与 CD 患者相比,NCGS 患者更有可能不同意“疫苗对乳糜泻患者是安全的”这一说法(NCGS 为 41.3%,CD 为 26.4%(p<0.0001),并且当提供疫苗时更有可能拒绝接种(30.9%对 24.2%,p=0.007)。在校正年龄和性别后,与 CD 患者相比,NCGS 患者更有可能避免食用转基因(GMO)食品(aOR 2.30;95%CI 1.71-3.10),只食用有机产品(aOR 2.87;95%CI 2.04-4.03),认为 FDA 是不可靠的信息来源(aOR 1.82,95%CI 1.26-2.64),并认为 GF 饮食能改善能量和注意力(aOR 2.52;95%CI 1.86-3.43)。

结论

与 CD 患者相比,NCGS 患者更有可能对疫苗安全性表示怀疑,并相信非转基因和有机食品的价值。我们的研究结果表明,缺乏关于麸质及其在食品和药物中含量的可靠信息可能会强化导致公共健康受损的信念。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验