Als Lorraine C, Nadel Simon, Cooper Mehrengise, Vickers Bea, Garralda M Elena
Centre for Mental Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Department of Paediatric Intensive Care, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 29;5(12):e009581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009581.
To assess feasibility and pilot a supported psychoeducational tool to improve parent and child mental health following discharge from a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), in preparation for a large randomised controlled trial (RCT).
Feasibility assessment and single-centre, parallel group, pilot RCT. A concealed computer generated list was used to randomise participants, with an allocation of 2:1 in favour of the intervention.
A PICU in an acute care hospital in London, UK.
31 parents of children aged 4-16 years-old admitted to PICU.
Parents received a psychoeducational tool supported by a telephone call. The psychoeducational tool outlined the possible psychological reactions in children and parents alongside management advice. The telephone call addressed each family's postdischarge experience, reinforced the psychoeducational material and encouraged parents to put into practice the advice given.
The primary outcome was the number of feasibility criteria successfully met (linked to the intervention and the study design). Secondary outcomes were questionnaire data collected at 3-6-month follow-up assessing mental health in parents and children.
31 parents were randomised (intervention n=22; treatment as usual, TAU n=9). 23 parents were included in the analysis of secondary outcomes (intervention n=17; TAU n=6). 3 (of 6) intervention and 1 (of 6) study design feasibility criteria were fully met. All unmet criteria could be addressed with minor or significant modifications to the protocol. At follow-up there was a tendency for parents who received the intervention to report lower post-traumatic stress symptoms in themselves and fewer emotional and behavioural difficulties in their children than TAU parents. This needs to be explored in a fully powered trial.
This feasibility and pilot RCT provided valuable information on the intervention and trial design for a full RCT.
NCT01737021; Results.
评估一种支持性心理教育工具的可行性,并在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)出院后改善家长和儿童心理健康方面进行试点,为大型随机对照试验(RCT)做准备。
可行性评估及单中心、平行组、试点RCT。使用隐蔽的计算机生成列表对参与者进行随机分组,以2:1的比例分配,支持干预组。
英国伦敦一家急症医院的PICU。
31名4至16岁儿童的家长,这些儿童入住了PICU。
家长收到一个由电话支持的心理教育工具。该心理教育工具概述了儿童和家长可能出现的心理反应以及应对建议。电话沟通涉及每个家庭出院后的经历,强化心理教育材料,并鼓励家长将所给建议付诸实践。
主要结局是成功满足的可行性标准数量(与干预措施和研究设计相关)。次要结局是在3至6个月随访时收集的问卷数据,评估家长和儿童的心理健康状况。
31名家长被随机分组(干预组n = 22;常规治疗组,TAU n = 9)。23名家长纳入次要结局分析(干预组n = 17;TAU组n = 6)。干预措施的6项可行性标准中有3项、研究设计的6项可行性标准中有1项完全满足。所有未满足的标准可通过对方案进行轻微或重大修改来解决。随访时,与常规治疗组家长相比,接受干预的家长报告自身创伤后应激症状较低,其子女的情绪和行为问题较少。这需要在一项全面的试验中进一步探究。
这项可行性和试点RCT为全面RCT的干预措施和试验设计提供了有价值的信息。
NCT01737021;结果