Gordon Morris, Akobeng Anthony
Department of Medical Education, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool, UK School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Sidra Medical & Research Center, Doha, Qatar Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Arch Dis Child. 2016 Mar;101(3):234-40. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309676. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
Racecadotril is an antisecretory agent that can prevent fluid/electrolyte depletion from the bowel as a result of acute diarrhoea without affecting intestinal motility. An up-to-date systematic review is indicated to summarise the evidence on racecadotril for the treatment of acute diarrhoea in children.
A Cochrane format systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Data extraction and assessment of methodological quality were performed independently by two reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
Children with acute diarrhoea, as defined by the primary studies.
RCTs comparing racecadotril with placebo or other interventions.
Duration of illness, stool output/volume and adverse events.
Seven RCTs were included, five comparing racecadotril with placebo or no intervention, one with pectin/kaolin and one with loperamide. Moderate to high risk of bias was present in all studies. There was no significant difference in efficacy or adverse events between racecadotril and loperamide. A meta-analysis of three studies with 642 participants showed significantly shorter duration of symptoms with racecadotril compared with placebo (mean difference -53.48 h, 95% CI -65.64 to -41.33). A meta-analysis of five studies with 949 participants showed no significant difference in adverse events between racecadotril and placebo (risk ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.34).
There is some evidence that racecadotril is more effective than placebo or no intervention in reducing the duration of illness and stool output in children with acute diarrhoea. However, the overall quality of the evidence is limited due to sparse data, heterogeneity and risk of bias. Racecadotril appears to be safe and well tolerated.
消旋卡多曲是一种抗分泌药物,可预防急性腹泻导致的肠道液体/电解质流失,且不影响肠道蠕动。现需进行一项最新的系统评价,以总结消旋卡多曲治疗儿童急性腹泻的证据。
采用Cochrane格式对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价。两名评价员独立进行数据提取和方法学质量评估。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估方法学质量。
符合主要研究定义的急性腹泻儿童。
比较消旋卡多曲与安慰剂或其他干预措施的随机对照试验。
病程、粪便排出量/体积及不良事件。
纳入7项随机对照试验,5项比较消旋卡多曲与安慰剂或无干预措施,1项比较消旋卡多曲与果胶/高岭土,1项比较消旋卡多曲与洛哌丁胺。所有研究均存在中度至高偏倚风险。消旋卡多曲与洛哌丁胺在疗效或不良事件方面无显著差异。对3项共642名参与者的研究进行的荟萃分析显示,与安慰剂相比,消旋卡多曲组症状持续时间显著缩短(平均差值-53.48小时,95%置信区间-65.64至-41.33)。对5项共949名参与者的研究进行的荟萃分析显示,消旋卡多曲与安慰剂在不良事件方面无显著差异(风险比0.99,95%置信区间0.73至1.34)。
有证据表明,消旋卡多曲在缩短急性腹泻儿童的病程和减少粪便排出量方面比安慰剂或无干预措施更有效。然而,由于数据稀少、异质性和偏倚风险,证据的总体质量有限。消旋卡多曲似乎安全且耐受性良好。