Burns Belinda L, Judge Debra S
School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology M309, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Am J Primatol. 2016 Jun;78(6):610-25. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22523. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
Maturation includes physical, reproductive, and social aspects that develop asynchronously. Intra- and inter-individual variation in the relative timing of each aspect reflects context-dependent plasticity. Plasticity in developmental timing may be important for the family-living small apes (family Hylobatidae), where reproductive opportunities are monopolized by territorial breeding pairs. Data on development in hylobatids are so far limited due to their elusive arboreal niche and long lifespans. Herein, we provide the first quantitative analysis of behavioral development in 14 captive individuals of three species (Hylobates moloch, Nomascus leucogenys, and Symphalangus syndactylus), with some individuals being observed over 8 years. To establish a baseline for behavioral development, we compare the behavior of infants (0-2 years), juveniles (2-4 years), adolescents (4-6 years), and subadults (6-9 years) in their natal groups from data obtained over 250 focal observation hours. We then relate changes in behavior to measures of somatic and physiological development, and to wild populations, to identify the degree of intra- and inter-individual variation in developmental timing. We found greater concordance between behavioral and physiological markers of weaning than between different markers of later development, and the timing of later milestones varied more among individuals. Behavioral estimates from both captive and wild individuals in their natal groups indicate that puberty begins close to age 5, but physiological maturation can occur 0.5-3 years earlier in captive individuals than in wild individuals. Ages at onset of puberty, sexual, and social maturation vary in both captive and wild populations. The available evidence indicates that the social environment during development (e.g., presence of breeding female and appropriate mating partner), as well as nutrition, play a role in the timing of life history transitions in hylobatids. Am. J. Primatol. 78:610-625, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
成熟包括身体、生殖和社会等方面,这些方面的发展是不同步的。每个方面相对时间的个体内和个体间差异反映了依赖于环境的可塑性。发育时间的可塑性对于生活在家庭中的小型猿类(长臂猿科)可能很重要,在那里繁殖机会被占据领地的繁殖对垄断。由于长臂猿难以捉摸的树栖生态位和较长的寿命,到目前为止关于它们发育的数据有限。在此,我们对三种长臂猿(爪哇长臂猿、白颊长臂猿和合趾猿)的14只圈养个体的行为发育进行了首次定量分析,部分个体被观察了8年以上。为了建立行为发育的基线,我们根据超过250小时的焦点观察数据,比较了出生群体中婴儿(0 - 2岁)、幼年(2 - 4岁)、青少年(4 - 6岁)和亚成体(6 - 9岁)的行为。然后,我们将行为变化与身体和生理发育指标以及野生种群相关联,以确定发育时间的个体内和个体间差异程度。我们发现断奶的行为和生理指标之间的一致性高于后期发育的不同指标之间的一致性,后期里程碑的时间在个体间差异更大。来自圈养个体及其出生群体中的野生个体的行为估计表明,青春期始于接近5岁,但圈养个体的生理成熟可能比野生个体早0.5 - 3年。圈养和野生种群中青春期、性成熟和社会成熟的起始年龄都有所不同。现有证据表明,发育期间的社会环境(例如,繁殖雌性和合适的交配伙伴的存在)以及营养,在长臂猿生活史转变的时间上发挥着作用。《美国灵长类学杂志》78:610 - 625,2016年。©2015威利期刊公司