University Hospital Toulouse-Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Apr;67(4):648-59. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.10.024. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
1-year data from this trial showed the noninferiority of a novel once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT; Envarsus XR) to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) twice daily after kidney transplantation.
Final 24-month analysis of a 2-armed, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, phase 3 trial.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 543 de novo kidney recipients randomly assigned to LCPT (n=268) or IR-Tac (n=275); 507 (93.4%) completed the 24-month study.
LCPT tablets once daily at 0.17 mg/kg/d or IR-Tac twice daily at 0.1 mg/kg/d; subsequent doses were adjusted to maintain target trough ranges (first 30 days, 6-11 ng/mL; thereafter, 4-11 ng/mL). The intervention was 24 months; the study was double blinded for the entirety.
OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Treatment failure (death, transplant failure, biopsy-proven acute rejection, or loss to follow up) within 24 months. Safety end points included adverse events, serious adverse events, new-onset diabetes, kidney function, opportunistic infections, and malignancies. Pharmacokinetic measures included total daily dose (TDD) of study drugs and tacrolimus trough levels.
24-month treatment failure was LCPT, 23.1%; IR-Tac, 27.3% (treatment difference, -4.14% [95% CI, -11.38% to +3.17%], well below the +10% noninferiority criterion defined for the primary 12-month end point). Subgroup analyses showed fewer treatment failures for LCPT versus IR-Tac among black, older, and female recipients. Safety was similar between groups. From month 1, TDD was lower for LCPT; the difference increased over time. At month 24, mean TDD for LCPT was 24% lower than for the IR-Tac group (P<0.001), but troughs were similar (means at 24 months: LCPT, 5.47 ± 0.17 ng/mL; IR-Tac, 5.8 ± 0.30 ng/mL; P=0.4).
Trial participant eligibility criteria may limit the generalizability of results to the global population of de novo kidney transplant recipients.
Results suggest that once-daily LCPT in de novo kidney transplantation has comparable efficacy and safety profile to that of IR-Tac. Lower TDD reflects LCPT's improved bioavailability and absorption.
本试验的 1 年数据显示,新型每日 1 次延长释放他克莫司(LCPT;Envarsus XR)与每日 2 次即时释放他克莫司(IR-Tac)相比,在肾移植后具有非劣效性。
一项 2 臂、平行组、随机、双盲、双模拟、多中心、3 期试验的最终 24 个月分析。
543 名初治肾移植受者随机分为 LCPT 组(n=268)或 IR-Tac 组(n=275);507 名(93.4%)完成了 24 个月的研究。
LCPT 片剂每日 1 次,剂量为 0.17mg/kg/d;IR-Tac 每日 2 次,剂量为 0.1mg/kg/d;随后根据维持目标谷浓度范围(最初 30 天 6-11ng/ml;此后 4-11ng/ml)调整剂量。干预时间为 24 个月;该研究对所有参与者进行了双盲。
24 个月内治疗失败(死亡、移植失败、活检证实的急性排斥反应或失访)。安全性终点包括不良事件、严重不良事件、新发糖尿病、肾功能、机会性感染和恶性肿瘤。药代动力学测量包括研究药物的总日剂量(TDD)和他克莫司谷浓度。
24 个月时 LCPT 组治疗失败率为 23.1%,IR-Tac 组为 27.3%(治疗差异-4.14%[95%CI-11.38%至+3.17%],远低于定义为主要 12 个月终点的+10%非劣效性标准)。亚组分析显示,在黑人、老年和女性受者中,LCPT 组的治疗失败率低于 IR-Tac 组。两组安全性相似。从第 1 个月开始,LCPT 的 TDD 较低;随着时间的推移,这种差异增加。在第 24 个月时,LCPT 的平均 TDD 比 IR-Tac 组低 24%(P<0.001),但谷浓度相似(24 个月时的平均值:LCPT 组 5.47±0.17ng/ml;IR-Tac 组 5.8±0.30ng/ml;P=0.4)。
试验参与者的入选标准可能限制了结果在全球初治肾移植受者人群中的普遍性。
结果表明,新型每日 1 次 LCPT 在初治肾移植中具有与 IR-Tac 相当的疗效和安全性。较低的 TDD 反映了 LCPT 改善的生物利用度和吸收。