Suppr超能文献

在初次肾移植中,每日一次和每日两次使用他克莫司制剂的生物利用度和成本。

Bioavailability and costs of once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplantation.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2018 Aug;32(8):e13311. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13311. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

Abstract

The use of once-daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplantation is increasingly common. Therefore, we were interested in bioavailability aspects of novel once-daily tacrolimus (LCPT, Envarsus) and once-daily tacrolimus extended-release formulation (ER-Tac, Advagraf) compared with twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac, Prograf). Furthermore, we calculated the costs. Kidney allograft recipients on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression within 2 clinical trials were included in a single-center analysis. The tacrolimus formulations were compared with respect to daily doses, doses per body weight, trough levels, and concentration-dose (C/D) ratio over 12 months. Intrapatient variability in trough levels and C/D ratios after 3 months was calculated. For the calculation of tacrolimus costs, German list prices were used. Eighty patients (21 with LCPT, 23 with IR-Tac, and 36 with ER-Tac) were analyzed. Pharmacokinetic comparisons revealed significantly higher bioavailability of LCPT at all visits. The variability of trough levels and C/D ratios in general was high and highest in LCPT patients. Different dose requirements translated into different costs. Median treatment costs during the first year were 7.825€ (IQR 6.195-8.892€) for LCPT, 9.813€ (IQR 7.630-16.832€) for IR-Tac, and 9.838€ (IQR 7.503- 13.541€) for ER-Tac (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = .003). The 3 tacrolimus formulations exhibit different dose requirements, exposure, and costs in favor of LCPT.

摘要

在肾移植的新方案中,每日一次的他克莫司应用日益广泛。因此,我们对新型每日一次他克莫司(LCPT,Envarsus)和每日一次他克莫司延长释放制剂(ER-Tac,Advagraf)与每日两次的即时释放他克莫司(IR-Tac,Prograf)相比的生物利用度方面很感兴趣。此外,我们还计算了成本。在 2 项临床试验中,基于他克莫司的免疫抑制剂的肾移植受者被纳入单中心分析。比较了他克莫司制剂的日剂量、单位体重剂量、谷浓度和 12 个月时的浓度-剂量(C/D)比值。计算了 3 个月后谷浓度和 C/D 比值的个体内变异性。计算他克莫司成本时,使用了德国的目录价格。分析了 80 例患者(21 例使用 LCPT,23 例使用 IR-Tac,36 例使用 ER-Tac)。药代动力学比较显示 LCPT 在所有随访时的生物利用度明显更高。谷浓度和 C/D 比值的变异性通常较高,在 LCPT 患者中最高。不同的剂量需求转化为不同的成本。第一年的中位治疗费用分别为:LCPT 为 7825 欧元(IQR 6195-8892 欧元),IR-Tac 为 9813 欧元(IQR 7630-16832 欧元),ER-Tac 为 9838 欧元(IQR 7503-13541 欧元)(Kruskal-Wallis 检验,P = 0.003)。3 种他克莫司制剂的剂量要求、暴露量和成本均不同,LCPT 更具优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验